<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Reasons Why Social Media is Killing Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/</link>
	<description>Ideas for Social Media Strategists, Business Innovators &#38; Disruptors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-33396</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-33396</guid>
		<description>Yes, Twitter is much more organic than Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Twitter is much more organic than Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-33394</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-33394</guid>
		<description>I started using Twitter three weeks ago; that&#039;s how I ended up reading this article. Though I had done extensive research for almost two years on new media technology, digital sociality, and literacy, the connections I quickly made on Twitter led me to many resources I&#039;d never seen. They way I see it, all the like-minded people I follow on Twitter are like a research team, so of course I discover more through Twitter than Google. What is more effective? One person searching a topic, or 100 people (each with their own unique approach) searching a topic? The answer is obvious. 

Here&#039;s what I love about this article: it proves that people are better searchers than computers. Chalk one up for humanity! Seriously, Twitter is much more ORGANIC than Google. And everybody knows that organic is better than synthetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using Twitter three weeks ago; that&#8217;s how I ended up reading this article. Though I had done extensive research for almost two years on new media technology, digital sociality, and literacy, the connections I quickly made on Twitter led me to many resources I&#8217;d never seen. They way I see it, all the like-minded people I follow on Twitter are like a research team, so of course I discover more through Twitter than Google. What is more effective? One person searching a topic, or 100 people (each with their own unique approach) searching a topic? The answer is obvious. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I love about this article: it proves that people are better searchers than computers. Chalk one up for humanity! Seriously, Twitter is much more ORGANIC than Google. And everybody knows that organic is better than synthetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search As Content: What Does It Mean To Publishers In The Age of Social Media? &#124; New Comm Biz</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-33240</link>
		<dc:creator>Search As Content: What Does It Mean To Publishers In The Age of Social Media? &#124; New Comm Biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-33240</guid>
		<description>[...] SEO and Search are not dying like some &lt;cough&gt; people have suggested. For old content it  still matters very much. It would probably matter more to me  if I was monetizing the site or writing about news and current events. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEO and Search are not dying like some &lt;cough&gt; people have suggested. For old content it  still matters very much. It would probably matter more to me  if I was monetizing the site or writing about news and current events. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coffee Club</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-29469</link>
		<dc:creator>Coffee Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-29469</guid>
		<description>2010 is the era of social media, but I don&#039;t think that social media is killing search.  Still social media is a part of search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 is the era of social media, but I don&#39;t think that social media is killing search.  Still social media is a part of search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Excerpted: Is Social Media Killing Search? &#171; Hypios &#8211; Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-28880</link>
		<dc:creator>Excerpted: Is Social Media Killing Search? &#171; Hypios &#8211; Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-28880</guid>
		<description>[...] Anderson&#8217;s full posts on search and social media here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anderson&#8217;s full posts on search and social media here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elissa</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-28783</link>
		<dc:creator>Elissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-28783</guid>
		<description>Awesome.  Thanks for breaking it down for someone who is not the most tech savvy.  Very clear and very interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome.  Thanks for breaking it down for someone who is not the most tech savvy.  Very clear and very interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracking the Google vs. Facebook Race by @ScepticGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-28772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracking the Google vs. Facebook Race by @ScepticGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-28772</guid>
		<description>[...] the iPad demo? Steve Jobs demoed Facebook, not Google Search. Engagement on social networks is affecting the search business, as Tac Anderson observed. The rest of them use computers because their friends do, and they do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the iPad demo? Steve Jobs demoed Facebook, not Google Search. Engagement on social networks is affecting the search business, as Tac Anderson observed. The rest of them use computers because their friends do, and they do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfeuer</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-28761</link>
		<dc:creator>jfeuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-28761</guid>
		<description>thanks, Tac.  could you Tweet this blog post -  &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/6B5xwh&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/6B5xwh&lt;/a&gt; - I could use the exposure...appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, Tac.  could you Tweet this blog post &#8211;  <a href="http://bit.ly/6B5xwh" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6B5xwh</a> &#8211; I could use the exposure&#8230;appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 links #13 &#8211; Club dei media sociali</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-28753</link>
		<dc:creator>5 links #13 &#8211; Club dei media sociali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-28753</guid>
		<description>[...] 3 Reasons Why Social Media is Killing Search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3 Reasons Why Social Media is Killing Search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/3-reasons-why-social-media-is-killing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-28746</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=2500#comment-28746</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tac. Your observation about my comment being &quot;a post unto itself&quot; led me to take the comment back home, so to speak, and integrate it into a blog post I&#039;d been writing on &lt;a href=&quot;http://gumption.typepad.com/blog/2010/01/the-commoditization-of-twitter-followers.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the commoditization of Twitter followers&lt;/a&gt;, where it provided a missing piece to tie together a few loose ends at the conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tac. Your observation about my comment being &#8220;a post unto itself&#8221; led me to take the comment back home, so to speak, and integrate it into a blog post I&#39;d been writing on <a href="http://gumption.typepad.com/blog/2010/01/the-commoditization-of-twitter-followers.html" rel="nofollow">the commoditization of Twitter followers</a>, where it provided a missing piece to tie together a few loose ends at the conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

