Comments on: How does Journalism Stay Relevant? http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/ Ideas for Social Media Strategists, Business Innovators & Disruptors. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:33:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jarred http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-76 Jarred Mon, 07 May 2007 20:03:55 +0000 http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/#comment-76 I wonder far off we from losing the past time of having a cup of coffee and reading the paper in the morning? The only reason I buy the Sunday paper is because my wife love all those ads. I get all the news that I'm looking for from the new source's websites. It'll be an interesting day when the NY Times or the WSJ announces that they will become only a weekly printed or only an electronic news source. Like most things it is kind of excited but kind of sad at the same time. -Jarred I wonder far off we from losing the past time of having a cup of coffee and reading the paper in the morning? The only reason I buy the Sunday paper is because my wife love all those ads. I get all the news that I’m looking for from the new source’s websites.

It’ll be an interesting day when the NY Times or the WSJ announces that they will become only a weekly printed or only an electronic news source.

Like most things it is kind of excited but kind of sad at the same time.

-Jarred

]]> By: Jarred http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-31881 Jarred Mon, 07 May 2007 20:03:00 +0000 http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/#comment-31881 I wonder far off we from losing the past time of having a cup of coffee and reading the paper in the morning? The only reason I buy the Sunday paper is because my wife love all those ads. I get all the news that I'm looking for from the new source's websites. It'll be an interesting day when the NY Times or the WSJ announces that they will become only a weekly printed or only an electronic news source. Like most things it is kind of excited but kind of sad at the same time. -Jarred I wonder far off we from losing the past time of having a cup of coffee and reading the paper in the morning? The only reason I buy the Sunday paper is because my wife love all those ads. I get all the news that I’m looking for from the new source’s websites.

It’ll be an interesting day when the NY Times or the WSJ announces that they will become only a weekly printed or only an electronic news source.

Like most things it is kind of excited but kind of sad at the same time.

-Jarred

]]> By: Chris Blanchard http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-75 Chris Blanchard Mon, 07 May 2007 19:50:35 +0000 http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/#comment-75 The Wall Street Journal has an article today by the publisher of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. The article's title, "How to Sink a Newspaper" kind of gives away his opinion, which is that the fastest way to kill your paper is to have a website! The pull quote reads "free news for on-line customers is s disastrous business plan." Apparently the WSJ thinks so too since I can't link to the article on their site. You are of course right, Tac. The IBR should accelerate the use of on-line tools. I think the IBR is considered more relevant than ever now, largely because they are communicating WITH their audience. And I would bet that the better IBR web-site has actually increased circulation of the paper product. The Wall Street Journal has an article today by the publisher of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. The article’s title, “How to Sink a Newspaper” kind of gives away his opinion, which is that the fastest way to kill your paper is to have a website! The pull quote reads “free news for on-line customers is s disastrous business plan.” Apparently the WSJ thinks so too since I can’t link to the article on their site.

You are of course right, Tac. The IBR should accelerate the use of on-line tools. I think the IBR is considered more relevant than ever now, largely because they are communicating WITH their audience. And I would bet that the better IBR web-site has actually increased circulation of the paper product.

]]> By: Chris Blanchard http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-31880 Chris Blanchard Mon, 07 May 2007 19:50:00 +0000 http://www.newcommbiz.com/how-does-journalism-stay-relevant/#comment-31880 The Wall Street Journal has an article today by the publisher of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. The article's title, "How to Sink a Newspaper" kind of gives away his opinion, which is that the fastest way to kill your paper is to have a website! The pull quote reads "free news for on-line customers is s disastrous business plan." Apparently the WSJ thinks so too since I can't link to the article on their site. You are of course right, Tac. The IBR should accelerate the use of on-line tools. I think the IBR is considered more relevant than ever now, largely because they are communicating WITH their audience. And I would bet that the better IBR web-site has actually increased circulation of the paper product. The Wall Street Journal has an article today by the publisher of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. The article’s title, “How to Sink a Newspaper” kind of gives away his opinion, which is that the fastest way to kill your paper is to have a website! The pull quote reads “free news for on-line customers is s disastrous business plan.” Apparently the WSJ thinks so too since I can’t link to the article on their site.

You are of course right, Tac. The IBR should accelerate the use of on-line tools. I think the IBR is considered more relevant than ever now, largely because they are communicating WITH their audience. And I would bet that the better IBR web-site has actually increased circulation of the paper product.

]]>