<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IZEA&#8217;s no worse than traditional advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/</link>
	<description>Ideas for Social Media Strategists, Business Innovators &#38; Disruptors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online Marketing Connect &#8212; Blog &#8212; Why I Think Advertising and Social Media Need Each Other</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-32584</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Marketing Connect &#8212; Blog &#8212; Why I Think Advertising and Social Media Need Each Other</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-32584</guid>
		<description>[...] IZEA&#8217;s no worse than traditional advertising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IZEA&#8217;s no worse than traditional advertising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Comm Biz &#187; Sponsored Posts: Advertorial 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-27488</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comm Biz &#187; Sponsored Posts: Advertorial 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-27488</guid>
		<description>[...] debates happening around sponsored posts and what&#8217;s acceptable.Â  I&#8217;ve posted before on my take. I think that the method is neutral, it has the potential to be equally used for good or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debates happening around sponsored posts and what&#8217;s acceptable.Â  I&#8217;ve posted before on my take. I think that the method is neutral, it has the potential to be equally used for good or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-24853</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-24853</guid>
		<description>Well stated.  There is no right or wrong in a situation like this.  The problem with most of the commentary is that it is taking sides, when that&#039;s not really the important discussion.  

I&#039;m not comfortable with pay per post or bloggers who participate in it.  Brogan used the phrase &quot;renting his audience&quot; which is exactly true.  And if I don&#039;t want my attention to be commercialized, then I vote with my feet.

But the larger discussion is where this all falls in terms of its affect on the trust that people put in bloggers and the social media space.  That&#039;s the debate we need to be having.

Good blogger relations and blogger outreach is far more credible than buying your way onto a blog.  Of course I&#039;d say that, I&#039;m in PR, but it&#039;s the way I feel.  Organic, earned exposure is way more valuable than paid.

I read newspapers for the news, not the ads.  I read blogs for the content, not sponsored posts.  It&#039;s like this e-book http://changethis.com/44.04.TrustEconomy says:

Understand that the digital natives know whoâ€™s there to market and sell, and whoâ€™s there to
build relationships. We (the digital natives) know youâ€™re new. We often can tell really quickly that
youâ€™re hoping to introduce your product or service to the conversation. Some of us will even
be more responsive to this than others. But, then there will be many who will cry foul the moment
you cross the line into pure sales or marketing. Remember, the Trust Economy is a conversation/
relationship environment. We know youâ€™ve got a job to do, but there are lots of people who
prefer you do it elsewhere if youâ€™re going to use traditional â€œbombâ€ marketing and sales efforts,
versus â€œhand to handâ€ relationship building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well stated.  There is no right or wrong in a situation like this.  The problem with most of the commentary is that it is taking sides, when that&#8217;s not really the important discussion.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not comfortable with pay per post or bloggers who participate in it.  Brogan used the phrase &#8220;renting his audience&#8221; which is exactly true.  And if I don&#8217;t want my attention to be commercialized, then I vote with my feet.</p>
<p>But the larger discussion is where this all falls in terms of its affect on the trust that people put in bloggers and the social media space.  That&#8217;s the debate we need to be having.</p>
<p>Good blogger relations and blogger outreach is far more credible than buying your way onto a blog.  Of course I&#8217;d say that, I&#8217;m in PR, but it&#8217;s the way I feel.  Organic, earned exposure is way more valuable than paid.</p>
<p>I read newspapers for the news, not the ads.  I read blogs for the content, not sponsored posts.  It&#8217;s like this e-book <a href="http://changethis.com/44.04.TrustEconomy" rel="nofollow">http://changethis.com/44.04.TrustEconomy</a> says:</p>
<p>Understand that the digital natives know whoâ€™s there to market and sell, and whoâ€™s there to<br />
build relationships. We (the digital natives) know youâ€™re new. We often can tell really quickly that<br />
youâ€™re hoping to introduce your product or service to the conversation. Some of us will even<br />
be more responsive to this than others. But, then there will be many who will cry foul the moment<br />
you cross the line into pure sales or marketing. Remember, the Trust Economy is a conversation/<br />
relationship environment. We know youâ€™ve got a job to do, but there are lots of people who<br />
prefer you do it elsewhere if youâ€™re going to use traditional â€œbombâ€ marketing and sales efforts,<br />
versus â€œhand to handâ€ relationship building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-32299</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-32299</guid>
		<description>Well stated.  There is no right or wrong in a situation like this.  The problem with most of the commentary is that it is taking sides, when that&#039;s not really the important discussion.  

I&#039;m not comfortable with pay per post or bloggers who participate in it.  Brogan used the phrase &quot;renting his audience&quot; which is exactly true.  And if I don&#039;t want my attention to be commercialized, then I vote with my feet.

But the larger discussion is where this all falls in terms of its affect on the trust that people put in bloggers and the social media space.  That&#039;s the debate we need to be having.

Good blogger relations and blogger outreach is far more credible than buying your way onto a blog.  Of course I&#039;d say that, I&#039;m in PR, but it&#039;s the way I feel.  Organic, earned exposure is way more valuable than paid.

I read newspapers for the news, not the ads.  I read blogs for the content, not sponsored posts.  It&#039;s like this e-book http://changethis.com/44.04.TrustEconomy says:

Understand that the digital natives know who’s there to market and sell, and who’s there to
build relationships. We (the digital natives) know you’re new. We often can tell really quickly that
you’re hoping to introduce your product or service to the conversation. Some of us will even
be more responsive to this than others. But, then there will be many who will cry foul the moment
you cross the line into pure sales or marketing. Remember, the Trust Economy is a conversation/
relationship environment. We know you’ve got a job to do, but there are lots of people who
prefer you do it elsewhere if you’re going to use traditional “bomb” marketing and sales efforts,
versus “hand to hand” relationship building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well stated.  There is no right or wrong in a situation like this.  The problem with most of the commentary is that it is taking sides, when that&#8217;s not really the important discussion.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not comfortable with pay per post or bloggers who participate in it.  Brogan used the phrase &#8220;renting his audience&#8221; which is exactly true.  And if I don&#8217;t want my attention to be commercialized, then I vote with my feet.</p>
<p>But the larger discussion is where this all falls in terms of its affect on the trust that people put in bloggers and the social media space.  That&#8217;s the debate we need to be having.</p>
<p>Good blogger relations and blogger outreach is far more credible than buying your way onto a blog.  Of course I&#8217;d say that, I&#8217;m in PR, but it&#8217;s the way I feel.  Organic, earned exposure is way more valuable than paid.</p>
<p>I read newspapers for the news, not the ads.  I read blogs for the content, not sponsored posts.  It&#8217;s like this e-book <a href="http://changethis.com/44.04.TrustEconomy" rel="nofollow">http://changethis.com/44.04.TrustEconomy</a> says:</p>
<p>Understand that the digital natives know who’s there to market and sell, and who’s there to<br />
build relationships. We (the digital natives) know you’re new. We often can tell really quickly that<br />
you’re hoping to introduce your product or service to the conversation. Some of us will even<br />
be more responsive to this than others. But, then there will be many who will cry foul the moment<br />
you cross the line into pure sales or marketing. Remember, the Trust Economy is a conversation/<br />
relationship environment. We know you’ve got a job to do, but there are lots of people who<br />
prefer you do it elsewhere if you’re going to use traditional “bomb” marketing and sales efforts,<br />
versus “hand to hand” relationship building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tac</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-24849</link>
		<dc:creator>Tac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-24849</guid>
		<description>Dan I should clarify. 
Most bloggers are not journalist - don&#039;t think there&#039;s any disagreement there.
But people - the people complaining the most, who live in the echo chamber of the blogosphere - have come to trust them like they are. 
In fact, in some circles they trust them more.

But I think it&#039;s a good thing for any professional, who blogs, should have a disclosure statement. Mine&#039;s in the right sidebar. I fully disclose all my professional and financial ties because I recognize that they will effect my blog posts, either what I say or what I don&#039;t say.

Good luck w/ FAS &lt;shudder&gt; glad us EIR&#039;s don&#039;t have to do that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan I should clarify.<br />
Most bloggers are not journalist &#8211; don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any disagreement there.<br />
But people &#8211; the people complaining the most, who live in the echo chamber of the blogosphere &#8211; have come to trust them like they are.<br />
In fact, in some circles they trust them more.</p>
<p>But I think it&#8217;s a good thing for any professional, who blogs, should have a disclosure statement. Mine&#8217;s in the right sidebar. I fully disclose all my professional and financial ties because I recognize that they will effect my blog posts, either what I say or what I don&#8217;t say.</p>
<p>Good luck w/ FAS <shudder> glad us EIR&#8217;s don&#8217;t have to do that <img src='http://www.newcommbiz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </shudder></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tac</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-32298</link>
		<dc:creator>Tac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-32298</guid>
		<description>Dan I should clarify. 
Most bloggers are not journalist - don&#039;t think there&#039;s any disagreement there.
But people - the people complaining the most, who live in the echo chamber of the blogosphere - have come to trust them like they are. 
In fact, in some circles they trust them more.

But I think it&#039;s a good thing for any professional, who blogs, should have a disclosure statement. Mine&#039;s in the right sidebar. I fully disclose all my professional and financial ties because I recognize that they will effect my blog posts, either what I say or what I don&#039;t say.

Good luck w/ FAS  glad us EIR&#039;s don&#039;t have to do that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan I should clarify.<br />
Most bloggers are not journalist &#8211; don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any disagreement there.<br />
But people &#8211; the people complaining the most, who live in the echo chamber of the blogosphere &#8211; have come to trust them like they are.<br />
In fact, in some circles they trust them more.</p>
<p>But I think it&#8217;s a good thing for any professional, who blogs, should have a disclosure statement. Mine&#8217;s in the right sidebar. I fully disclose all my professional and financial ties because I recognize that they will effect my blog posts, either what I say or what I don&#8217;t say.</p>
<p>Good luck w/ FAS  glad us EIR&#8217;s don&#8217;t have to do that <img src='http://www.newcommbiz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan...</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-24847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-24847</guid>
		<description>Hey Tac, good commentary and thanks for the &quot;good guy&quot; nod.  

I have so many posts stacked up on this topic as I work on FAS157 valuations.  They&#039;ll prolly get published once it no longer matters -- that&#039;s fine, you and others are doing a great job of covering all sides.

You and I disagree on &quot;Most bloggers are not journalist, but people have come to trust them like they are.&quot;  I think a well-worded poll, delivered to a diverse group could put that concept to bed pretty quickly.

That said, there remains an opportunity to help audiences appreciate the goals/conflicts/context of any site they visit, whether publishers claim to be entertainer, journalist, free-pass conference promoter, enthusiast, loaner tech reviewer, photographer, affiliate marketer, personal diarist etc.  It feels like a Disclosure Policy framework (like Privacy Policies; see IZEA&#039;s http://www.DisclosurePolicy.org/ ), could go a long way in that effort.  When you have so many varied expectations between publishers and readers, such a system needs a framework to help everyone match expectations.

Any help you can provide improving that framework or spreading the word appreciated...things like only marketing with blogs that carry a Disclosure Policy, can go a long way to a long-term solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tac, good commentary and thanks for the &#8220;good guy&#8221; nod.  </p>
<p>I have so many posts stacked up on this topic as I work on FAS157 valuations.  They&#8217;ll prolly get published once it no longer matters &#8212; that&#8217;s fine, you and others are doing a great job of covering all sides.</p>
<p>You and I disagree on &#8220;Most bloggers are not journalist, but people have come to trust them like they are.&#8221;  I think a well-worded poll, delivered to a diverse group could put that concept to bed pretty quickly.</p>
<p>That said, there remains an opportunity to help audiences appreciate the goals/conflicts/context of any site they visit, whether publishers claim to be entertainer, journalist, free-pass conference promoter, enthusiast, loaner tech reviewer, photographer, affiliate marketer, personal diarist etc.  It feels like a Disclosure Policy framework (like Privacy Policies; see IZEA&#8217;s <a href="http://www.DisclosurePolicy.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.DisclosurePolicy.org/</a> ), could go a long way in that effort.  When you have so many varied expectations between publishers and readers, such a system needs a framework to help everyone match expectations.</p>
<p>Any help you can provide improving that framework or spreading the word appreciated&#8230;things like only marketing with blogs that carry a Disclosure Policy, can go a long way to a long-term solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan...</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-32297</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-32297</guid>
		<description>Hey Tac, good commentary and thanks for the &quot;good guy&quot; nod.  

I have so many posts stacked up on this topic as I work on FAS157 valuations.  They&#039;ll prolly get published once it no longer matters -- that&#039;s fine, you and others are doing a great job of covering all sides.

You and I disagree on &quot;Most bloggers are not journalist, but people have come to trust them like they are.&quot;  I think a well-worded poll, delivered to a diverse group could put that concept to bed pretty quickly.

That said, there remains an opportunity to help audiences appreciate the goals/conflicts/context of any site they visit, whether publishers claim to be entertainer, journalist, free-pass conference promoter, enthusiast, loaner tech reviewer, photographer, affiliate marketer, personal diarist etc.  It feels like a Disclosure Policy framework (like Privacy Policies; see IZEA&#039;s http://www.DisclosurePolicy.org/ ), could go a long way in that effort.  When you have so many varied expectations between publishers and readers, such a system needs a framework to help everyone match expectations.

Any help you can provide improving that framework or spreading the word appreciated...things like only marketing with blogs that carry a Disclosure Policy, can go a long way to a long-term solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tac, good commentary and thanks for the &#8220;good guy&#8221; nod.  </p>
<p>I have so many posts stacked up on this topic as I work on FAS157 valuations.  They&#8217;ll prolly get published once it no longer matters &#8212; that&#8217;s fine, you and others are doing a great job of covering all sides.</p>
<p>You and I disagree on &#8220;Most bloggers are not journalist, but people have come to trust them like they are.&#8221;  I think a well-worded poll, delivered to a diverse group could put that concept to bed pretty quickly.</p>
<p>That said, there remains an opportunity to help audiences appreciate the goals/conflicts/context of any site they visit, whether publishers claim to be entertainer, journalist, free-pass conference promoter, enthusiast, loaner tech reviewer, photographer, affiliate marketer, personal diarist etc.  It feels like a Disclosure Policy framework (like Privacy Policies; see IZEA&#8217;s <a href="http://www.DisclosurePolicy.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.DisclosurePolicy.org/</a> ), could go a long way in that effort.  When you have so many varied expectations between publishers and readers, such a system needs a framework to help everyone match expectations.</p>
<p>Any help you can provide improving that framework or spreading the word appreciated&#8230;things like only marketing with blogs that carry a Disclosure Policy, can go a long way to a long-term solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-24845</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-24845</guid>
		<description>I knew that image would come back to haunt me. : )

Great post Tac, very balanced. Thanks for telling it like it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that image would come back to haunt me. : )</p>
<p>Great post Tac, very balanced. Thanks for telling it like it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-32296</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/izeas-no-worse-than-traditional-advertising/#comment-32296</guid>
		<description>I knew that image would come back to haunt me. : )

Great post Tac, very balanced. Thanks for telling it like it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that image would come back to haunt me. : )</p>
<p>Great post Tac, very balanced. Thanks for telling it like it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

