<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge Management Renaissance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/</link>
	<description>Social Media and the Future of Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Three questions to ask when seeking a new job - Workplace Excellence - Dan Bobinski talks about Skills for Workplace Excellence</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Three questions to ask when seeking a new job - Workplace Excellence - Dan Bobinski talks about Skills for Workplace Excellence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>[...] probably take up few hundred words, so let me go with where I stared: Tac Andersonâ€™s post on Knowledge Management at his NewCommBiz blog, which links to Peter-Anthony Glickâ€™s Leveraging Organizational Knowledge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] probably take up few hundred words, so let me go with where I stared: Tac Andersonâ€™s post on Knowledge Management at his NewCommBiz blog, which links to Peter-Anthony Glickâ€™s Leveraging Organizational Knowledge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tac</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Tac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Even the Scientometrics shows a dip around 00.  Not much of one, but to those of us not directly in that industry I think it seemed more severe than it was.  Of course most of us were probably more worried about the dot.bomb than we were about KM at the time.  Good think the KM people weren&#039;t paying attention to the rest of us.
I haven&#039;t read any papers from back then but I&#039;d be interested to see how much the whole 2.0 movement is changing the way the KM practitioners are thinking about KM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the Scientometrics shows a dip around 00.  Not much of one, but to those of us not directly in that industry I think it seemed more severe than it was.  Of course most of us were probably more worried about the dot.bomb than we were about KM at the time.  Good think the KM people weren&#8217;t paying attention to the rest of us.<br />
I haven&#8217;t read any papers from back then but I&#8217;d be interested to see how much the whole 2.0 movement is changing the way the KM practitioners are thinking about KM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Vinson</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Vinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny to find this post when I just saw another that shows citations for papers that reference KM: http://scientometrics.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/5-years-after-knowledge-management-another-management-fad/

I&#039;ve seen other citation-related articles which showed KM dropping off in the early 00&#039;s, and then rebounding.  The Scientometrics article just shows a constant increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny to find this post when I just saw another that shows citations for papers that reference KM: <a href="http://scientometrics.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/5-years-after-knowledge-management-another-management-fad/" rel="nofollow">http://scientometrics.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/5-years-after-knowledge-management-another-management-fad/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen other citation-related articles which showed KM dropping off in the early 00&#8217;s, and then rebounding.  The Scientometrics article just shows a constant increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/knowledge-management-renaissance/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I first related to this on a personal level as began to read, which made me giggle as I pictured a sort of tabbed file system in my brain.  So I read on.    I&#039;m now going to have to add another tab (which of course have the topics scrawled on them in red sharpie) entitled, KM.
 Thanks.... this was fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first related to this on a personal level as began to read, which made me giggle as I pictured a sort of tabbed file system in my brain.  So I read on.    I&#8217;m now going to have to add another tab (which of course have the topics scrawled on them in red sharpie) entitled, KM.<br />
 Thanks&#8230;. this was fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
