<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microblogging is about to go Supernova</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/microblogging-is-about-to-go-supernova/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/microblogging-is-about-to-go-supernova/</link>
	<description>Ideas for Social Media Strategists, Business Innovators &#38; Disruptors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tac</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/microblogging-is-about-to-go-supernova/comment-page-1/#comment-26162</link>
		<dc:creator>Tac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=817#comment-26162</guid>
		<description>5 yrs from now is optomistic. By that I just mean it will be so main stream we won&#039;t even think about it. Kind of like we don&#039;t question that Twitter was built on the Web. Messaging services will be built on Twitter and other microblogging tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 yrs from now is optomistic. By that I just mean it will be so main stream we won&#8217;t even think about it. Kind of like we don&#8217;t question that Twitter was built on the Web. Messaging services will be built on Twitter and other microblogging tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tac</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/microblogging-is-about-to-go-supernova/comment-page-1/#comment-32370</link>
		<dc:creator>Tac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=817#comment-32370</guid>
		<description>5 yrs from now is optomistic. By that I just mean it will be so main stream we won&#039;t even think about it. Kind of like we don&#039;t question that Twitter was built on the Web. Messaging services will be built on Twitter and other microblogging tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 yrs from now is optomistic. By that I just mean it will be so main stream we won&#8217;t even think about it. Kind of like we don&#8217;t question that Twitter was built on the Web. Messaging services will be built on Twitter and other microblogging tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Diablo</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/microblogging-is-about-to-go-supernova/comment-page-1/#comment-26161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Diablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=817#comment-26161</guid>
		<description>True, True, True. The statement in bold sums the future of this platform up quite nicely. I think 5 years might even be generous. 

How many of us &quot;early adopters&quot; interact with twitter directly even at this point? I have one app for data and info mining/monitoring, another for aggregating and filtering based on priority/interest, and thats not even to taking into account iphone/smartphone apps for on the go use. 

just considering the possibilities makes new launches like @wefollow look dated in comparison, eh? Not useless...just dated.

Good stuff, Tac. as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, True, True. The statement in bold sums the future of this platform up quite nicely. I think 5 years might even be generous. </p>
<p>How many of us &#8220;early adopters&#8221; interact with twitter directly even at this point? I have one app for data and info mining/monitoring, another for aggregating and filtering based on priority/interest, and thats not even to taking into account iphone/smartphone apps for on the go use. </p>
<p>just considering the possibilities makes new launches like @<a href="http://twitter.com/wefollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View wefollow's Twitter Profile">wefollow</a> look dated in comparison, eh? Not useless&#8230;just dated.</p>
<p>Good stuff, Tac. as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Diablo</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/microblogging-is-about-to-go-supernova/comment-page-1/#comment-32369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Diablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=817#comment-32369</guid>
		<description>True, True, True. The statement in bold sums the future of this platform up quite nicely. I think 5 years might even be generous. 

How many of us &quot;early adopters&quot; interact with twitter directly even at this point? I have one app for data and info mining/monitoring, another for aggregating and filtering based on priority/interest, and thats not even to taking into account iphone/smartphone apps for on the go use. 

just considering the possibilities makes new launches like @wefollow look dated in comparison, eh? Not useless...just dated.

Good stuff, Tac. as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, True, True. The statement in bold sums the future of this platform up quite nicely. I think 5 years might even be generous. </p>
<p>How many of us &#8220;early adopters&#8221; interact with twitter directly even at this point? I have one app for data and info mining/monitoring, another for aggregating and filtering based on priority/interest, and thats not even to taking into account iphone/smartphone apps for on the go use. </p>
<p>just considering the possibilities makes new launches like @<a href="http://twitter.com/wefollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View wefollow's Twitter Profile">wefollow</a> look dated in comparison, eh? Not useless&#8230;just dated.</p>
<p>Good stuff, Tac. as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

