Top 10 Blog Posts [May 2009] FriendFeed Steals the Show

Peter Kim has been doing a monthly top post recap for a while now. I like this approach and decided to steal this idea and remix it a little. He does it for convenience if anyone missed any of his posts. I like it for different reasons. It’s a simple way to show you what content resonated the most with readers.

For comparison I’ve also included the dates well as the PostRank score for each post. You can see this blogs full PostRank profile here (my profile is here). The raw numerical ranking is based off Google Analytics traffic numbers. The PostRank score is based off views and the number of times it was shared on Twitter and FriendFeed.

  1. FriendFeed is Reaching Critical Mass PR 10 – 5/20/09
  2. Enterprise 2.0 Needs a FriendFeed PR 10 – 5/19/09
  3. Why URL Shorteners Are Important PR 10 – 5/21/09
  4. What I learned from HP about co-opetition PR 7.4 – 4/30/09
  5. Ads in FriendFeed-This Could be Huge PR 10 – 5/19/09
  6. Leaving HP. Back to Agency Life PR 10 – 4/20/09
  7. How I moved up 300 spots in AdAge’s Power 150 in 4 months PR 5.5 – 5/05/09
  8. Social Media will soon face the realities of multiculturalism PR 5.8 – 5/04/09
  9. Despite the Promise of Social Networks Local Businesses Struggle with Marketing ROI PR 10 – 5/19/09
  10. Will RSS Ever Go Mainstream? 5.6 – 5/04/09

What resonated the most with you this month? FriendFeed was the big winner. (Kind of validates the claim I made in that most popular post doesn’t it?) After that the post I made when I left HP as well as my final HP posts had the most longevity.

It is interesting to note that nothing posted in the last 10 days shows
up on the list which makes sense given they wouldn’t have had as much
time as the others. It’s also interesting to note that some of the most visited blogs were not always the most shareable. Interesting.

Hope you found this useful. I’ll do my best to make this a monthly habit.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Will Twitter build or acquire a business model?

5 years from now the non-early adopters will be using dozens of services built on top of Twitter and they won’t even realize it

Q: When will we stop talking about Twitter’s business model?
A: Never.

Why do you think we’ll stop talking about it once they have a business model? Heck, a week doesn’t go by when I don’t read a story about Google, Microsoft or Yahoo’s business model why will Twitter be any different?

I recently posted on Twitter a link to a post I did encouraging people to build the features they wanted on top of Twitter and had a great dialogue with a friend in Seattle.

tacanderson: Want new Twitter features? Build them yourself. http://bit.ly/MRd03

philoking: @tacanderson I think if Twitter’s plan (which I doubt) is not innovate and allow 3rd parties to create the value for the service, it dies.

tacanderson: @philoking sitting on all that cash i think Twitter will acquire the services that provide monetization.

philoking: @tacanderson This may sound silly, but Twitter’s advertising health will have a lot to do with how many celebrities they can get to tweet.

tacanderson: @philoking that’s assuming Twitter wants to go the advertising route. (I don’t think they will) but you may be right if they do.

philoking: @tacanderson how would they stay solvent? Selling premium accounts like Pownce? That worked. lol

tacanderson: @philoking there are more ways to monetize the web than premium subscriptions and advertising :)

While some people find it amusing that us rank and file social media types have derived years of pleasure and blog posts about Twitter and their plans for monetization (Twitter VC Laughs at the Idea that Twitter Has No Business Model – ReadWriteWeb) I personally think Twitter finds itself in a similar situation as Microsoft or SalesForce.com.

Even if Twitter develops a way to monetize (which I’m sure they will) there will be huge amounts of money left on the Twitter table.

With an open API, more buzz than most think they deserve and a boat load of VC cash I think eventually Twitter will go on a shopping spree. They’ve already demonstrated the ability and desire to do this with their purchase of Summize and Values of N (while the latter was really just a talent acquisition).

In recent posts I’ve talked about Twitter as the last bastion of Web 2.0 innovation (yes that’s a gross exaggeration) and the rise of the micropreneur.

Why do I geek out so much on Twitter? I see Twitter as the future of communication. OK, to be fair I see all social media that way but I think 5 years from now the non-early adopters will be using dozens of services built on top of Twitter and they won’t even realize it.

Old model: build large audience get acquired by Google. New model: monetize large audience someone else has built.

So the answer to my initial question: Yes. Twitter and many others will acquire startups that can monetize Twitter (or any other social network).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Kudos to Jack Box. Get well.

If you agree with character blogs and character Twitter accounts is one thing. I was disappointed with the Hang In There Jack campaign because the site was down, obviously bombarded after the ad ran (which I thought was funny).

The site is a blog and has a Twitter account. The only thing that would have been better was if they had a Jack in the Box employee on Twitter that was able to monitor and responds to tweets in real time as they received feedback.

We’ll see how the campaign roles out but finally someone was paying attention and used their millions of dollars to extend the campaign past the ad itself.

Either way they get  5 stars in my book.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 6037 access attempts in the last 7 days.