Traffic vs Engagement vs Influence: Top 10 Posts [August 2009]

It’s been very interesting to do these top 10 posts because it let’s me look at 3 different factors:

  • Traffic – The posts are ranked based on traffic (unique hits) according to Google Analytics.
  • Engagement – How many comments a blog receives is usually considered a level of engagement.
  • Influence – The PostRank scores are meant to judge the level of influence your post has based on things like tweets, comments, bookmarks on Delicious, etc.

Some might argue that I should base my ranking on PostRank since it’s a more complete view. I don’t use PostRank as my ranking for this list because then I would only be basing it on posts made in a month which would not account for posts made in previous months. Also PostRank does not get everything, they frequently do not gather all the tweets that Tweetmeme gets, so it’s still not totally accurate, but it’s a really good indicator.

The main reason I base this list on traffic (even though that’s not the goal of this blog) is that tweets and comments don’t always equate to traffic. Sometimes one tweet or one link from the right source is far more valuable then a dozen tweets and links from other sources.

This month for instance shows me that 3 of Augusts Top 10 are from July. That’s because of the sites that linked to them.

Where my traffic is coming from?

Twitter is the number one driver of traffic to my site, although Facebook showed up in my Top 10 for the first time. But this traffic is very short term.

Search is the number two driver of traffic. Both Google and Bing appear in my Top 10 traffic sources.

Links are the number three driver of traffic. While some are legitimate follow on posts, several of my links come to me from other Zemanta users. This is the best feature of Zemanta but most people overlook that when doing product reviews.

Top 10 posts for August

  1. You Do Not Have to be Social Media Famous. 8/10/09 47 tweets, 7.8 PostRank, 9 comments
  2. You are Crazy not to Measure the ROI of Social Media! 8/27/09 37 tweets, 9.3 PostRank, 4 comments
  3. Lessons from Gnomedex: Too Geeky is a Good Thing 8/24/09 13 tweets, 7.8 PostRank, 3 comments
  4. My GTD Moleskine Hacks 7/07/09 2 tweets, 6.0 PostRank, 6 comments
  5. So Shut the Tweet Up! 8/07/09 27 tweets, 9.0 PostRank, 15 comments
  6. How to use Posterous for Internal Collaboration 7/30/09 9 tweets, 7.1 PostRank, 3 comments
  7. Mobile App Blogging Thanks to Posterous: Regator vs MeeHive vs Byline 8/19/09 7 tweets, 4.1 PostRank, 4 comments
  8. Agencies Get Out of Your Client’s Way 8/11/09 16 tweets, 6.1 PostRank, 8 comments
  9. It’s the Message Stupid! News and Politics. [A Case Study] 8/13/09 5 tweets, 3.6 PostRank, 2 comments
  10. How a DM via Twitter to a Blog with a Link to Facebook Got Me My Job 7/27/09 21 tweets, 10.0 PostRank, 4 comments
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Posterous plus PostRank equals Pretty Cool

I love it when I get to talk about how to combine multiple products into something even cooler. This is one such post. This may not be new to some of you but I just figured it out.

Do you use Posterous? (If you haven’t set one up yet email your reason why to post@posterous.com if you’d like to set one up email the same address.)

Do you subscribe to lots of other Posterous blogs? If you’re like me you do and I get them all in one daily email. I had thought of going through each account and subscribing individually to each post. But that was too much work so I haven’t yet. The problem with the emails is there are too many of them and they aren’t mobile friendly.

The other problem is that people use Posterous like a scrapbook. Not those frilly scrapbooks where people spend hundreds of hours making them into works of art but real scrap books where we keep all our raw thoughts and collections of stuff.

That’s a lot of noise. Good noise but still noise. How do you filter just the good ones?

Fortunately I found a fix to both problems.

You will need FireFox (my stats tell me that’s half of you), Google Reader (the 800 lb gorilla in the feed reader market), and your PostRank account.

If you have all of those go to this address http://www.postrank.com/postrank/firefox and install the FireFox extension. Now go to this address http://posterous.com/reader and subscribe to that feed in Google Reader (assuming you haven’t already).

PostRankerous

PostRankerous

What you’re seeing is PostRank rankings next to each Posterous post. It’s on a scale of 1.0 to 10.0 and the darker the orange the bigger the number. If I use the drop down menu I can just select to view All, Good, Great or Best. If I’m in a hury this allows me to quickly filter out a certain level of noise and get to the good stuff.

The great thing about the PostRank plugin is that it works with all your Google reader items. But I usually use Feedly to view those if I’m on the Web. (Hey Feedly meet PostRank. PostRank meet Feedly. It would be *really* cool if I could combine those two services.)

And by subscribing to the reader view, anytime I follow a new Posterous account it is automatically added to that feed. Brilliant! Love it.

Photo credit: Tac Anderson

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Top 10 Blog Posts [May 2009] FriendFeed Steals the Show

Peter Kim has been doing a monthly top post recap for a while now. I like this approach and decided to steal this idea and remix it a little. He does it for convenience if anyone missed any of his posts. I like it for different reasons. It’s a simple way to show you what content resonated the most with readers.

For comparison I’ve also included the dates well as the PostRank score for each post. You can see this blogs full PostRank profile here (my profile is here). The raw numerical ranking is based off Google Analytics traffic numbers. The PostRank score is based off views and the number of times it was shared on Twitter and FriendFeed.

  1. FriendFeed is Reaching Critical Mass PR 10 – 5/20/09
  2. Enterprise 2.0 Needs a FriendFeed PR 10 – 5/19/09
  3. Why URL Shorteners Are Important PR 10 – 5/21/09
  4. What I learned from HP about co-opetition PR 7.4 – 4/30/09
  5. Ads in FriendFeed-This Could be Huge PR 10 – 5/19/09
  6. Leaving HP. Back to Agency Life PR 10 – 4/20/09
  7. How I moved up 300 spots in AdAge’s Power 150 in 4 months PR 5.5 – 5/05/09
  8. Social Media will soon face the realities of multiculturalism PR 5.8 – 5/04/09
  9. Despite the Promise of Social Networks Local Businesses Struggle with Marketing ROI PR 10 – 5/19/09
  10. Will RSS Ever Go Mainstream? 5.6 – 5/04/09

What resonated the most with you this month? FriendFeed was the big winner. (Kind of validates the claim I made in that most popular post doesn’t it?) After that the post I made when I left HP as well as my final HP posts had the most longevity.

It is interesting to note that nothing posted in the last 10 days shows
up on the list which makes sense given they wouldn’t have had as much
time as the others. It’s also interesting to note that some of the most visited blogs were not always the most shareable. Interesting.

Hope you found this useful. I’ll do my best to make this a monthly habit.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

What Makes for a Well Balanced Media Diet?

taken by :he:משתמש:Hmbr
Image via Wikipedia

What Makes for a Well Balanced Media Diet?

Farhad Manjoo over at Slate really kicked up a storm in a tea cup 2 weeks ago (wow, that was a really bad mixed metaphor) with his Kill Your RSS Reader post.

Mashable covered it and did a poll of their users use of RSS. I covered the Mashable post. WebWorkerDaily included my post in their post about RSS and social media.

I have no doubt Farhad’s post generated hundreds of other reactions.  As I went back and reread Farhad’s post and got beyond the obvious link baiting headline I realized that:
A- He has some useful advice about navigating news sites.
B- His post represents 1/3 of the new madia consumption equation.

What are the 3 parts of modern day media consumption?

  1. RSS Readers
  2. Social Networks
  3. Aggregation Sites

Drowning in RSS

Farhad’s problem was that RSS became overwhelming and he couldn’t keep up. Former HP colleague Eric Herberholz mentioned in a comment to my post how he likes RSS just has a hard time managing it.

The problem is that people treat their RSS feeds like email. RSS and blogs are NOT email. You do not have to read them all. RSS feeds arfe like a news paper.

For those of you who read the paper everyday, do you read the whole thing? There are some people who say they read the *whole* paper “front to back”. These people are liars. No one reads every word of any newspaper. I doubt the editors of the papers even do. People really just scan the articles that interest them as they go. RSS is no different. Scan, read what strikes your interest and then move on.

Social Networks and Discovery

One of the arguments old media defenders use against a blog only media diet is there is no chance for discovery. You only consume media from a narrow niche and are not “surprised” by the discovery of an unexpected story. These people argue that physical papers and magazines provide this better than blogs. For once, I mostly agree with them.

Discovery is the fiber in a healthy media diet.

I follow 300 blogs. I rarely see interesting yet “off topic” items. I read 200 posts a day just to stay on top of my industry. Not to discover new things.

While blogs don’t provide discovery, Twitter is better at providing discovery than the newspaper or magazines. Other than talking about food conecting with interesting people, link sharing is the most important Twitter activity. The third most important activity is retweeting (RT).

This is why the latest wave in Twitter apps are link aggregation sites. The current leader and best implementaion of this so far is Tweetmeme. See the bubble and retweet button at the bottom of this post. Click it. It’ll send a ‘RT @tacanderson’ for this post to twitter. The most popular RT’s surface to the top of Tweetmeme. The obvious analogy is that it’s the Digg of RT’s, just without the snarky commentary.

This is how I discover great ‘off topic’ content. FriendFeed would be a better tool for discovery if it wasn’t too much ‘off topic’ content. I realize I could eliminate most of this with filters but that’s too much work.

Aggregation and the Portal Page

So going back to Farhad, he had some great points and suggestions about how to navigate news sites. I’m pretty good with using keyboard shortcuts but he totally schooled me with his mouse tips.

If you think of the wheel only as a tool to scroll with, dear friend, you’re missing out; the middle mouse button does so much more. For example, it’s the best way to open a link in a background tab. You can use the same button to quickly close unwanted tabs, too—click and release a tab you just opened, and voila, it disappears. In Firefox, the middle button has one extra power: Click an empty space in the tab bar and you’ll open up the last tab you closed, which is a godsend if you accidentally sent away something important.

Very cool.

I am going to create a bit of heresy here with my next statement: There is some news that is better consumed on page. There I said it. Many news sites and portal pages have a great UI that lends itself to on page consumption. Most ruin this with pop-ups and flash ads that roam all over the page. There are also several mega aggregators that don’t allow for RSS consumption and even if they did they would flood your RSS reader with nothing else. I like the WatrCoolr sites. Techmeme is a long time geek favorite. Alltop and up-and-comers PostRank also provide better onsite consumption.

(I also find it ironic that newspapers are really just news aggregators anymore. What percentage of news in your average paper was actually written by the paper? Now take out press releases that are repurposed exactly or with minimal re-writing.)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 5984 access attempts in the last 7 days.