<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and Distributed Influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/twitter-and-distributed-influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/twitter-and-distributed-influence/</link>
	<description>Social Media and the Future of Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Comm Biz &#187; Why it doesn&#8217;t matter how big Twitter gets</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/twitter-and-distributed-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-28164</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comm Biz &#187; Why it doesn&#8217;t matter how big Twitter gets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1986#comment-28164</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter and Distributed Influence (newcommbiz.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter and Distributed Influence (newcommbiz.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itamar Rogel</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/twitter-and-distributed-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-28145</link>
		<dc:creator>Itamar Rogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1986#comment-28145</guid>
		<description>Wow, great post. It&#039;s quite eye-opening to see this laid out like that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An interesting thing is that with Twitter becoming a major source of traffic, the visitors&#039; behavioral patterns also probably change - for example, producing less page views per visit. For the tech sites, this behavior pattern isn&#039;t new (see e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-publishing/who-reads-technology-blogs-a-dirty-analysis-of-reader-demographics-002631.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-publishing/who-r...&lt;/a&gt; ), but if/when Twitter will become a major content discovery tool for the mainstream crowds, it will be interesting to see how major mainstream blogs &amp; sites (like Huffington, Drudge) cope with that. Currently they enjoy much less &quot;hectic&quot; user behavior - e.g. more page views per visitor and a higher percentage of frequently-repeating users. Twitter doesn&#039;t yet seem to be a major source of visitors for them (look at the relatively low number of followers they have). Having Twitter becoming a major of source of visitors for mainstream sites will have a profound effect on them, more so than for tech blogs which &quot;suffered&quot; from this user behavior patterns even before Twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, if the conclusions from the data are correct, in a way that&#039;s a problem of branding / uniqueness  - if users indeed perceive Mashable and TechCrunch as directly interchangeable. Not to these great blogs&#039; fault, but you wouldn&#039;t see this kind of effect with Perez Hilton. What can I say - we tech readers sure aren&#039;t a faithful bunch ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great post. It&#39;s quite eye-opening to see this laid out like that.</p>
<p>An interesting thing is that with Twitter becoming a major source of traffic, the visitors&#39; behavioral patterns also probably change &#8211; for example, producing less page views per visit. For the tech sites, this behavior pattern isn&#39;t new (see e.g. <a href="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-publishing/who-reads-technology-blogs-a-dirty-analysis-of-reader-demographics-002631.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-publishing/who-r.." rel="nofollow">http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-publishing/who-r..</a>. ), but if/when Twitter will become a major content discovery tool for the mainstream crowds, it will be interesting to see how major mainstream blogs &#038; sites (like Huffington, Drudge) cope with that. Currently they enjoy much less &#8220;hectic&#8221; user behavior &#8211; e.g. more page views per visitor and a higher percentage of frequently-repeating users. Twitter doesn&#39;t yet seem to be a major source of visitors for them (look at the relatively low number of followers they have). Having Twitter becoming a major of source of visitors for mainstream sites will have a profound effect on them, more so than for tech blogs which &#8220;suffered&#8221; from this user behavior patterns even before Twitter.</p>
<p>Also, if the conclusions from the data are correct, in a way that&#39;s a problem of branding / uniqueness  &#8211; if users indeed perceive Mashable and TechCrunch as directly interchangeable. Not to these great blogs&#39; fault, but you wouldn&#39;t see this kind of effect with Perez Hilton. What can I say &#8211; we tech readers sure aren&#39;t a faithful bunch <img src='http://www.newcommbiz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
