<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Heck is a Lifestream?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/</link>
	<description>Social Media and the Future of Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:28:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Comm Biz &#187; I&#8217;m Open Sourcing The Business Plans I Never Used</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/comment-page-1/#comment-28288</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comm Biz &#187; I&#8217;m Open Sourcing The Business Plans I Never Used</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1938#comment-28288</guid>
		<description>[...] What the Heck is a Lifestream? (newcommbiz.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What the Heck is a Lifestream? (newcommbiz.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tips For The Stream // Links for 2009-11-03 &#124; Mostly (New) Media - Definitely Digital</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/comment-page-1/#comment-28203</link>
		<dc:creator>Tips For The Stream // Links for 2009-11-03 &#124; Mostly (New) Media - Definitely Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1938#comment-28203</guid>
		<description>[...] What the Heck is a Lifestream? (newcommbiz.com)   No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Tips For The Stream // Links for 2009-11-03&quot;, url: &quot;http://www.wowfeed.com/2009/11/04/links-for-2009-11-03/&quot; }); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What the Heck is a Lifestream? (newcommbiz.com)   No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Tips For The Stream // Links for 2009-11-03&quot;, url: &quot;http://www.wowfeed.com/2009/11/04/links-for-2009-11-03/&quot; }); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Krynsky</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/comment-page-1/#comment-28119</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Krynsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1938#comment-28119</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention Tac. The description I wrote which you mentioned was written when I started the blog back in early 2007. It was that concept (primarily the aggreagation of 3rd party services on a single page) that was being developed that I latched on to. Now it seems that it is harder to define as many different people see Lifestreaming in different ways. I think it&#039;s still primarily referenced with regards to aggregation, but it&#039;s now going down many vertical paths that include brandstreaming, storystreaming, travelstreaming, and countless others. I don&#039;t know if we&#039;ll ever get to a standard industry definition because of this. Although I&#039;m not so concerned with an industry definition as much as I am a open standard that can be adopted like RSS. Right now the closest thing to that is the ActivityStrea.ms initiative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention Tac. The description I wrote which you mentioned was written when I started the blog back in early 2007. It was that concept (primarily the aggreagation of 3rd party services on a single page) that was being developed that I latched on to. Now it seems that it is harder to define as many different people see Lifestreaming in different ways. I think it&#39;s still primarily referenced with regards to aggregation, but it&#39;s now going down many vertical paths that include brandstreaming, storystreaming, travelstreaming, and countless others. I don&#39;t know if we&#39;ll ever get to a standard industry definition because of this. Although I&#39;m not so concerned with an industry definition as much as I am a open standard that can be adopted like RSS. Right now the closest thing to that is the ActivityStrea.ms initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacanderson</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/comment-page-1/#comment-28102</link>
		<dc:creator>tacanderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1938#comment-28102</guid>
		<description>Yeah, with the exception of the distribution what Steve is doing is really much more like what blogging used to be 5-6 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, with the exception of the distribution what Steve is doing is really much more like what blogging used to be 5-6 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kskobac</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/comment-page-1/#comment-28100</link>
		<dc:creator>kskobac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1938#comment-28100</guid>
		<description>I guess if Posterous is really being used as the starting point for all online content it makes more sense as a lifestream, but to me Rubel has more rebranded and reset expectations for his blogging efforts - i wrote my thoughts on Louis Grey&#039;s post here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/10/communicating-in-age-of-streams-with.html#comment-20156559&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/10/communicating...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if Posterous is really being used as the starting point for all online content it makes more sense as a lifestream, but to me Rubel has more rebranded and reset expectations for his blogging efforts &#8211; i wrote my thoughts on Louis Grey&#39;s post here: <a href="http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/10/communicating-in-age-of-streams-with.html#comment-20156559" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/10/communicating.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/10/communicating..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacanderson</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/comment-page-1/#comment-28098</link>
		<dc:creator>tacanderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1938#comment-28098</guid>
		<description>Bring it on, Bryan! LOL. I agree, I think it&#039;s great that Steve&#039;s&lt;br&gt;raised awareness around Lifestreaming beyond FriendFeed because it is&lt;br&gt;an activity or publishing type not a platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring it on, Bryan! LOL. I agree, I think it&#39;s great that Steve&#39;s<br />raised awareness around Lifestreaming beyond FriendFeed because it is<br />an activity or publishing type not a platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BryanPerson</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/what-the-heck-is-a-lifestream/comment-page-1/#comment-28097</link>
		<dc:creator>BryanPerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=1938#comment-28097</guid>
		<description>Tac: Great question yesterday for Steve. We really are still figuring this all out and I think Steve is able to push the discussion by calling his site a &quot;lifestream,&quot; even if it really feels like a blog that also includes content pushed to different social channels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get ready for my hard-hitting questions later today. Maybe I&#039;ll ask YOU to define lifestreaming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tac: Great question yesterday for Steve. We really are still figuring this all out and I think Steve is able to push the discussion by calling his site a &#8220;lifestream,&#8221; even if it really feels like a blog that also includes content pushed to different social channels.</p>
<p>Get ready for my hard-hitting questions later today. Maybe I&#39;ll ask YOU to define lifestreaming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
