<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do some companies get eaten alive by bloggers while others don&#8217;t?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/why-do-some-companies-get-eaten-alive-by-bloggers-while-others-dont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/why-do-some-companies-get-eaten-alive-by-bloggers-while-others-dont/</link>
	<description>Ideas for Social Media Strategists, Business Innovators &#38; Disruptors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Comm Biz &#187; The Violent Origins of Marketing Communications</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/why-do-some-companies-get-eaten-alive-by-bloggers-while-others-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-27506</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comm Biz &#187; The Violent Origins of Marketing Communications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=684#comment-27506</guid>
		<description>[...] Why do some companies get eaten alive by bloggers while others don&#8217;t? (newcommbiz.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why do some companies get eaten alive by bloggers while others don&#8217;t? (newcommbiz.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/why-do-some-companies-get-eaten-alive-by-bloggers-while-others-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-25938</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=684#comment-25938</guid>
		<description>I think transparency, sincerity, and timeliness make up a good portion of it. A company that makes a statement weeks after the incident comes across as trying to hide something and disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think transparency, sincerity, and timeliness make up a good portion of it. A company that makes a statement weeks after the incident comes across as trying to hide something and disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/why-do-some-companies-get-eaten-alive-by-bloggers-while-others-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-32355</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcommbiz.com/?p=684#comment-32355</guid>
		<description>I think transparency, sincerity, and timeliness make up a good portion of it. A company that makes a statement weeks after the incident comes across as trying to hide something and disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think transparency, sincerity, and timeliness make up a good portion of it. A company that makes a statement weeks after the incident comes across as trying to hide something and disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

