Think Before You Tweet: The Do Not Tweet List

loose tweets sink fleetsAlternately named “Loose Tweets Sink Fleets.”

To quote my good friend and colleague Jeremy Meyers:

“Twitter is very conducive to posting without thinking.”

There are many instances of company and employee tweets gone wrong. A tweet can be a 140 character time bomb. Time and time again people have said things on Twitter that have blown up in their face.

Most recently Twitter developer Alex Payne posted “If you had some of the nifty site features that we Twitter employees have, you might not want to use a desktop client. (You will soon.)”

While on one level this may seem benign enough. Alex is excited about the product that his company is making. The problem is  that Twitter has grown to the size that it is because of third party developers. Twitter has obviously made a decision to compete more and more with the very developers that helped make them popular. That single tweet tipped their hand and surely caused Twitter a flurry of phone calls, emails and headaches right before their first developer conference.

This is a huge challenge for companies. You want to be open and social but you don’t want to leak information or send mixed messages in the market. What fascinated me the most was the way Twitter responded. They responded like a large company not the social media darling that they are.

MG Siegler has a great post on a reporter/blogger perspective of the leaked Twitter tweet.

So why do Twitter employees (and others) get mad? Because we’re amplifying the statement Payne made which they think he shouldn’t have. This is nothing new, it happens all the time in all forms of media. And companies hate it because they want to be in control of the message. But the fact of the matter is that he made an interesting statement, and people are clearly interested in reading about it, reading thoughts about it, and leaving their own comments about it.

Employees Don’t Be Stupid

This problem isn’t going away. Just like sending an email to the wrong person or replying in the wrong IM window hasn’t gone away, Twitter is just one more channel for miscommunications. The problem is that, unlike IM or email, it’s a very public forum.

Think before you tweet. Anytime you’re going to say something publicly, take just a split second to think about what you’re posting. The below list is meant for your personal account when posting about work related items. This is my first stab at the list so I’d love some feedback.

The Do Not Tweet List

  1. Don’t complain about your customers on Twitter. They are listening.
  2. DM is not IM. It’s not a secure communication channel.
  3. Disclose conflicts of interest: Clients, Competitors, Partners.
  4. Don’t get defensive about negative criticism of your company or products.
  5. Don’t publicize private issues or jeopardize the company’s working relationships.
  6. Unless soliciting community feedback is part of your product development, don’t  tweet about products under development.
  7. Don’t post about company financials before an earnings call. This can get you and your company in trouble with the SEC.
  8. If you have a gripe about a coworker or your boss talk to them about it. Tweeting about it is passive aggressive and makes you and the company look bad.
  9. Don’t spam your personal account with irrelevant work promotions. Promoting work is fine if it’s relevant to your followers.
  10. Don’t think having an anonymous account makes any of this okay.

Companies Focus on Education not Control

Your employees are smart but not perfect. Instead of trying to control employees we need to educate them. Remind them regularly that there are just some things they shouldn’t talk about in any public communications. You can just throw open the doors and expect there to not be any mistakes. Learning has to happen and it happens through training or trial and error.

We have media training for executives before they make public statements why not employees?

What kind of training do you have for your employees around social media?

Join the New Comm Biz Facebook Page or follow the Twitter account.

Photo Credit by Brian Lane Winfield Moore

Popularity: 52% [?]

Tagged with:
 

How will the Future of Marketing be Organized?

So I’ve made the prediction that Marketing and PR (and potentially all comms) will be rolled up into one group. Making the prediction was easy. There are way to many inefficiencies in the way companies communicate. Now I ask myself the “put your money where your mouth is” question: What will this new org look like?

For the first time in 50 years we have a real opportunity to structurally change the way companies organize their communications groups. Reporting structure, team make up, work flow, all of it. It’s pretty exciting to me. But I’m stuck.

Should Marketing  job functions be defined by some version of stakeholder alignment? Customers, Employees, Shareholders, Partners. This is basically what we have today but if all functions were in one group that alone would improve things.

- OR -

Should Marketing job functions be defined by what they do? Messaging, Content/Distribution, Research, Support. Again just another condensed version of what we have today. And again if all of these groups were in the same org that would improve many things.

- OR -

Should Marketing jobs be aligned along integration points? Customer Integration, Partner Integration, Internal Integration (Shareholders and Employees), Influencer Integration (this is also where competitive lives). These roles would be defined by integrating feedback and two way communications with these groups into every cycle of the marketing process. Research, measurement and content creation would mostly be handled by agencies but do you also need someone who owns that internally.

None of these are perfect and they all leave out some aspects of  Marketing (remember marketing is much more than PR & Advertising). But do we really need those other functions? I think there’s a lot that we can do away with.

What do you think? These are just my raw thoughts from late last night with a few hours to sleep on it. I’d love your feedback. There are no stupid ideas at this point.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 2% [?]

What Does the Future of Marketing Organizations Look Like?

Here’s some images I pulled from a rough draft proposal I’ve been working on. I’ve really been taking a look at how should communications organizations be structured moving forward and what are the processes that need to be developed?

I’d love your thoughts.

Communication used to be one way and companies relied on the media to get there messages out.

Then the customer learned to talk back. Eventually companies got better at talking about their customers but not *to* them. And we were probably more reliant on the media than ever before.

We are finally to the point where companies are adding on social media efforts like blogs and Twitter. But it’s an afterthought and not integrated. While we are getting better at talking to the customers we are still reliant on the media. And sadly “the media” now includes a few blogs but we treat them all the same.

The next step is to get your company and clients on equal playing field with your customers and the media. Tell your story and invite your customers and the media to participate.

The next step will require a comprehensive overhaul of our communications and marketing groups to align processes and resources with a new approach.

Personally I think we will see an end to separate marketing and PR groups and everything will be rolled up into one group consisting of people who wear multiple hats and excel at the digital version of two or three marketing activities.

But the real challenge IMHO is processes. Platforms are great, people are indispensable but without the appropriate processes it’s all a waste of resources.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

What’s in a name? New Communications Business

Graphic representation of a minute fraction of...

So I thought I’d explain the title of my blog: NewCommBiz

I like things that are new.

It doesn’t even really matter what it is, just new stuff in general really interests me.

  • How/why is this new?
  • Where did the idea come from?
  • Who thought of the idea?
  • Is this going to be a success?
  • Who will ultimately use this?
  • How will they use it?

I love communication.

This is what I got my undergraduate degree in.

  • The way people communicate.
  • The way groups communicate.
  • The way communication effects our perceptions.
  • The way communication effects our culture.
  • Interpersonal, Small group, Mass Media, Computer Mediated.
  • Communication Theory.
  • Communication in practice.

I am fascinated by business.

It’s what I got my Masters degree in.

  • Business models.
  • Business innovation.
  • Business management.
  • Business lifecycles.
  • Business transitions.

The Trifecta

Now if you want to really get me geeked out, combine any of the above in any possible combination.

  • The effect the Internet is having on the media business.
  • Mobile phone adoption.
  • New Internet Businesses.
  • The information explosion and how knowledge workers aggregate and stay productive.

2 out of 3 ain’t bad

But really you don’t have to have all 3 to get me excited.

  • New business ideas that have nothing to do with the Internet.
  • Old communication business models.
  • General business challenges.
  • Old communication technologies.

Why am I telling you all of this? I don’t know really. Part of me thought you might be interested in what makes me tick. But partly because I’m seeing a lot more of the 2 out of 3 category.  At Highway 12 Ventures I see a lot of new businesses that have nothing to do with the Internet.  At HP I’m doing more and more “traditional” marketing. Things like CRM and metrics.

I find all of these things interesting and they really allow me to learn and grow. Hopefully this results in me being a better, more well rounded business leader.  I will probably even blog about some of these things, even though they may seem a little off topic from my traditional topics.

I hope you find it as interesting as I do and can learn something along the way.

P.S. To be fair the reason I’m interested in the traditional stuff is so I can see how new communication business ideas apply :)

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,

Image via Wikipedia

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 18% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Capital City Commuicators Go Up In Flames

Greg Stielstra and his book, PyroMarketing were an early influence on me in my new media development. The book is amazing and if there is ever a guy who GETS the philosophy of web2.0 it is Greg, you can actually download the audio of his book for free.

Tonight the IBR will be hosting a book with Greg in preparation for the CCC Spring Seminar, here’s the details:

Come to Book-Signing/Reception for Greg Stielstra – Monday, May 14

You’re invited to attend a book-signing/reception for Greg Stielstra at
6 p.m. on Monday, May 14, at the 8th Street Wine Bar in BoDo. This is a
pre-event for the Capital City Communicators Spring Seminar – Using New
Media to Engage Your Customers.

Stielstra is the author of “PyroMarketing: The Four Step Strategy to
Ignite Customer Evangelists and Keep Them for Life.” “BusinessWeek”
hails Stielstra’s book as “a marketing miracle.” “The Economist” says,
“PyroMarketing…can apply to a huge range of businesses.”

The reception is a great opportunity to mingle with your peers, enjoy
fine wines and appetizers, and meet the man who created the
PyroMarketing phenomenon.

And don’t forget, Greg will be the luncheon keynote speaker at the
seminar on Tuesday, May 15 at the Doubletree Hotel Boise – Riverside.
The seminar starts at 9 a.m.

Find a way to get there tonight, you won’t be sorry. “Spread the Fire!”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 18% [?]

Tagged with:
 

On Phenomenology and Web 2.0

What is the big deal about New Media?  Why do people think that anyone cares enough about what they have to say that they start blogging?  If you don’t know, you are obviously not blogging.

On my new business cards (when they get done) my title will say Phenomenologist (it was that or Prototypical Nonconformist).  Phenomenology is a type of research that requires the researcher to experience that which they are studying as a complete participant, not as an outside observer.

If you really want to understand what all the hype is, get involved.  At least try it out.  Start reading blogs, listen to podcasts (you won’t ever miss the radio).  Start your own blog, you can even start it privately.

There is a whole new level of collaboration and innovation that is happening on the web and if you’re not involved you are missing it.  Even if you’re reading blogs and watching what’s happening, you won’t be getting the full advantage the the social web has to offer.

Yes, New Media/Web 2.0 is overhyped.  No MySpace/Face Book is not all it’s cracked up to be.  Twitter is cool, but not THAT cool (ok, maybe it is).  But collectively the power of all of these mediums combined is revolutionizing the way that people communicate and collaborate.

The businesses that “Get It” will have a significant advantage.  This is definitely a case of first mover advantage, if you play the “wait and see” game too long, it will be too late.

How can you figure out if this is the right thing for you and your company or what is the best way to implement it?  Become a Phenomenologist.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 17% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Communication Convergence

Communication major dimensions scheme
Image via Wikipedia

Mike Manuel is one of my favorite bloggers and has been for quite a while.  His posts are always thought provoking.  This one especially struck a nerve with me.  He points out the amount of overlap in companies and agencies right now surrounding new media.

Media Guerrilla: New Media Twister, Everybody’s Playing…
Some folks will say that with this convergence comes a collapse, at least for some sectors and disciplines, but I honestly couldn’t tell you which ones. Personally, I don’t really care, it’s a fun time to be in the soup.

I love communications.  I love online communications.

This has lead me to do online PR, new media marketing, which lead to SEO, I do internal communications, work with IT people to develop intranet platforms.  The list goes on.

Am I trying to be all things to all people?  As consultants we all do to some degree.  I’ve always done these jobs because of a love for the work.

Helping people communicate with people online.  Isn’t that what it’s all about?

Who cares if it’s internal or external to an organization?  Who cares what it’s called?  But like Mike points out; it sure is fun.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 19% [?]

From Spam to SEO

Live Search logo
Image via Wikipedia

I’d like to thank all of those that came out to the Boise Chamber today for the lunch-n-learn.  We had a great conversation about the shifts in trust that are leading to the change in communication and society and what companies can do to adjust and stay relevant.

The next opportunity that I have to speak is Tuesday, the  27th at the Treasure Valley Consultants Network.  Check out TVCNet for more detail.  I will be speaking on Search Engine Optimization and what you can do today to increase your sites placement in the search engines.  Don’t worry, I won’t get too geeky, but will hopefully be able to give you some pointers so you can start seeing some immediate results.  I don’t have a handout yet, but I will post it as soon as i finalize the content.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 14% [?]

Bad Behavior has blocked 4514 access attempts in the last 7 days.