[NCB Best Of] Blogging Makes You Smarter

This week marks my 2 year blogiversary. To commemorate one of the things I thought I’d do is re-post some of my better older posts. This blog was originally posted on 5/30/07. This is the last of my 2 year blogiversary re-post series. Hope you enjoyed this blast from the past.

As I’ve been talking with companies about why they should be blogging (demonstrate expertise, SEO, project management, knowledge management) one reason struck me the other day as probably THE best reason to blog:

Blogging Makes You Smarter

It will make you, your employees and your entire organization smarter.

If you think about the creative process, we go through 4 steps:
Generating, Conceptualizing, Optimizing and Implementing.

The funny thing about these is that nobody is good at all 4. We are usually really good at one, okay to pretty good at one or two and usually suck at need to improve on at least one. That doesn’t mean that we can’t do all 4 well, it just means that we are naturally better at some than others.

Generating is the stage where we come up with the initial idea. These are your “idea guys.” These people never have shortages of ideas and some of them are actually good. Most of your marketers live here.

Conceptualizing is where we create the “big picture,” the “30,00 foot view.” Its usually here that we fight over the right analogy. We take the idea and start to shape it.

Optimizing is where we start to pull in our facts. This is the “practical application” phase. This is where your accountants and engineers live. You can’t have enough facts and data for these guys. This is where planning starts.

Implementation is where the rubber meets the road. Enough talk, lets go out and do it. This is your sales department (hopefully). Now that we have the idea, what it looks like and the details to implement it, it’s time to see if it flies.

Writing takes all 4 of these phases and no one is really good at all of them. I love phase 1, I could live in a think tank brain storming all day. I also enjoy phase 2, creating the possibilities of how an idea would work. I suck at need work on phase 3 (although I am constantly getting better), I make it a point to surround myself with these types of people. I’m even good at phase 4, I enjoy executing on ideas that I’m really excited about (assuming that they survived phase 3).

When you write (write well at least) you have to go through all 4 of these phases. When you blog you have the additional challenges of doing all of this and keeping your idea short and concise (and hopefully understandable). To be a blogger you have to do this consistently.

As you and your organization learn new topics, blog about them, share them and collaborate on these ideas, you collectively become smarter. Your team will be able to recall and apply the ideas better because they have internalized them, processed them and applied them in writing.

I know for me that even if no one was reading this blog, I would continue to do this because of the personal benefits I see, and I bet most bloggers would agree.  If you look at the great leaders and innovators they all did this in the form of a personal journal or letter writing. Blogging is just the 21st century version of that.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Creating Smarter Organizations.

Personification of knowledge (Greek ????????, ...
Image via Wikipedia

Previously I attacked the prickly area of Trust. This time I want to tackle an equally tricky area: Knowledge.

There are few areas inside a company, large or small, that are trickier to track than knowledge. There’s an entire professional disciple dedicated to knowledge management and even they struggle with how to measure the ROI of knowledge.

The Wikipedia entry on knowledge sheds some light on why this is problematic.

Knowledge is defined (Oxford English Dictionary) variously as (i) expertise, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject, (ii) what is known in a particular field or in total; facts and information or (iii) awareness or familiarity gained by experience of a fact or situation. Philosophical debates in general start with Plato’s formulation of knowledge as “justified true belief”. There is however no single agreed definition of knowledge presently, nor any prospect of one, and there remain numerous competing theories.

Knowledge acquisition involves complex cognitive processes: perception, learning, communication, association and reasoning. The term knowledge is also used to mean the confident understanding of a subject with the ability to use it for a specific purpose if appropriate. See Knowledge Management for additional details on that discipline.

How can we measure something that we can’t even define? It’s a philosophical dilemma that I doubt will ever be resolved. I’m not going to immediately give you the answer to the ROI question just yet. For now I’m going to make the assumption that we all see value in knowledge and we all agree that our companies would be better if we could create more shared knowledge.

For my purposes I would like to use the very loose definition of knowledge:

The theoretical or practical understanding of a subject

Where does knowledge come from? Once again I don’t want to join the raging debate of how we obtain knowledge so I’m going to take a very easy approach. I believe there are two main ways we obtain knowledge, processing information and/or doing something. For my purposes I want to focus on the first of these two.

Most knowledge workers spend the vast majority of their time, finding, processing and creating information. The entire Information Technology industry is founded on helping people inside companies do these three things better. But technology can only process information, not knowledge (my apologies to all the Artificial Intelligence people out there). As one manager said to me, I don’t care about what’s in their reports, I want to know how they came to their conclusions.

Social media and Web 2.0 have given the dusty old disciple of Knowledge Management a new found purpose and a whole slew of tool sets. You think knowledge management was tough in the 80’s and 90’s? Try managing exponential information.

But that’s exactly what we’re asked to do. We now have to search, filter, process and re-purpose more information in a single day than our ancestors had access to in their entire lives. And it’s only going to get worse.

But do you know what the worst part is? For all the knowledge that knowledge workers create, most of it never leaves their head and the stuff that does make it out ends up in someone’s inbox or shared over a phone call or in a hallway conversation. What happens when that person leaves the company? What happens when, even if they stay in your company, someone from a completely different department tries searching for that information on the company intranet? The results are usually the same: net = 0. the company doesn’t really benefit any beyond the reach of that one person.

To date we have seen the first promising signs of social media’s ability to manage and create knowledge. Bookmarks, tags, and other types of folksonomy allow people to sift, categorize and share information as they come across it. Wiki’s, blogs, micro-blogging and social networking tools allow people to collaborate, share and teach each other in both real time and time shifted. Add increased search capabilities, meta-data and RSS on top of these tools and you’re starting to see the promise in social media and Web 2.0 technologies.

While we’ve only really talked about the value of knowledge as it applies to employees, the same holds true for customers, partners and all of a companies stakeholders.

The great thing about these new tools is that they simultaneously capture information as it’s being created and shared. We will never be able to fully capture all knowledge inside an organization, even if we wanted to, but by enabling and encouraging the use of an integrated tool set with these capabilities you allow the rules of capitalism to apply to knowledge. The more that is shared, the more that is created.

In my next post I plan to show how innovation will also follow the same rules.

Image via Wikipedia

This post is part of my ongoing effort to blog the book I’ve been working on for too long before the end of the year. These are all rough first drafts that have not been edited or even proofread. Comments and patients are requested. You can follow the whole series through the category The Book

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 9% [?]

Tagged with:
 

What Twitter as email would look like.

If I could re-make Outlook

If only I could recreate corporate email. <sigh>

What you’re are seeing here is TweetDeck overlaying my Outlook. I only use Outlook at work because I have to. I love the simple fact that TweetDeck let’s me divide Twitter into groups. I’ve organized this by my local friends and everyone else. TweetDeck automatically separates replies and direct messages.

If you could send files through Twitter much like you can through Pownce and have group chat functionality, I fail to see any reason why a Twitter *like* client wouldn’t work for corporate email.

This of course doesn’t handle calendering or contacts but it’s not hard to see how Web 2.0 could replace our current corporate communications tools.

And I won’t go into it here but my mind is spinning with additional benefits around knowledge sharing and cross silo collaboration.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 18% [?]

Tagged with:
 

The military to use wiki’s to fight insurgence

Wiki based battle plans? Or Military 2.0?

Counterinsurgencies have been called learning competitions. With COIN, the side that learns faster and adapts more rapidly – the side with the better learning organization – usually wins.

A good friend of mine just forward me a Department of Defense request (sorry no link it was via email):

Counterinsurgency Campaign Design Tool Based on Logical Lines of Operation and Wiki-Inspired Knowledge Capture

It really blew me away (pun intended) when I read this. Never in my wildest dreams have I thought about the military using wiki’s for battle scenarios

OBJECTIVE: Develop a computer software capability to help commanders design counterinsurgency (COIN) campaigns utilizing logical lines of operation (LLOs) that have been captured from lessons learned on other campaigns through the use of collaborative information collection and sharing technologies similar in concept to Internet Wikis.

Could you imagine an environment that allowed soldiers to report in real time what the enemy was doing, what counterinsurgency techniques worked and what didn’t and allowed the commander to build on that body of knowledge, analyze it and adjust.

It’s always said that the curse of the military (or most organizations) is that they are ‘fighting the last war’. Meaning all there frame of reference all their plans are based on the last war they fought, not the current war. This type of wiki implementation could give military commanders the ability to fight the current war.

While the military has to design a tool that can do this in extreme situations with security requirements that would make corporate IT look like anarchy, the tools already exist to allow CEO’s to do this today.

What’s holding them back? The battle plan.

Technorati Tags: ,,,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 20% [?]

Blogging Makes You Smarter

As I’ve been talking with companies about why they should be blogging (demonstrate expertise, SEO, project management, knowledge management) one reason struck me the other day as probably THE best reason to blog:

Blogging Makes You Smarter

It will make you, your employees and your entire organization smarter.

If you think about the creative process, we go through 4 steps:
Generating, Conceptualizing, Optimizing and Implementing.

The funny thing about these is that nobody is good at all 4. We are usually really good at one, okay to pretty good at one or two and usually suck at need to improve on at least one. That doesn’t mean that we can’t do all 4 well, it just means that we are naturally better at some than others.

Generating is the stage where we come up with the initial idea. These are your “idea guys.” These people never have shortages of ideas and some of them are actually good. Most of your marketers live here.

Conceptualizing is where we create the “big picture,” the “30,00 foot view.” Its usually here that we fight over the right analogy. We take the idea and start to shape it.

Optimizing is where we start to pull in our facts. This is the “practical application” phase. This is where your accountants and engineers live. You can’t have enough facts and data for these guys. This is where planning starts.

Implementation is where the rubber meets the road. Enough talk, lets go out and do it. This is your sales department (hopefully). Now that we have the idea, what it looks like and the details to implement it, it’s time to see if it flies.

Writing takes all 4 of these phases and no one is really good at all of them. I love phase 1, I could live in a think tank brain storming all day. I also enjoy phase 2, creating the possibilities of how an idea would work. I suck at need work on phase 3 (although I am constantly getting better), I make it a point to surround myself with these types of people. I’m even good at phase 4, I enjoy executing on ideas that I’m really excited about (assuming that they survived phase 3).

When you write (write well at least) you have to go through all 4 of these phases. When you blog you have the additional challenges of doing all of this and keeping your idea short and concise (and hopefully understandable). To be a blogger you have to do this consistently.

As you and your organization learn new topics, blog about them, share them and collaborate on these ideas, you collectively become smarter. Your team will be able to recall and apply the ideas better because they have internalized them, processed them and applied them in writing.

I know for me that even if no one was reading this blog, I would continue to do this because of the personal benefits I see, and I bet most bloggers would agree.  If you look at the great leaders and innovators they all did this in the form of a personal journal or letter writing.  Blogging is just the 21st century version of that.

Additional Resources on Creativity and Learning in the workplace:
Min Basadur has a more thorough explanation of the creative process.
Dan Bobinski has a blog dedicated to learning and training in the workplace.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 21% [?]

Bad Behavior has blocked 4514 access attempts in the last 7 days.