Bloggers Love Self Reflection

FriendFeed vs Twitter

I do so enjoy self-reflection. I’d promise this is my last reflective look of 2009 but I’m afraid I’d make a liar out of myself.

Off to the right of this blog you’ll see the Top 10 posts according to the WordPress Popularity Contest widget as well as the Top 10 posts according to PostRank. PostRank puts a premium on recent activity while Popularity Contest puts a premium on overall activity which is why you see the discrepancy between the two.  Here are my top 10 posts of 2009 based solely on Traffic:

  1. This is Why Google Scares the Sh*t Out of Companies
  2. There is NOT too much information
  3. My GTD Moleskine Hacks
  4. Forget, Unfriend. The new put down is the Un-Retweet.
  5. Posterous Overtakes FriendFeed, Set to Overtake Delicious.
  6. Leaving HP. Back to Agency Life.
  7. On Being an Influencer and Marketing as Media
  8. Wikipedia is the best thing ever!
  9. You Do Not Have to be Social Media Famous.
  10. Top 5 Predictions for the Next 5 Years in Business Social Media

[UPDATE] Melanie over at PostRank sent this for me as well. Thanks.

While you’re waiting with bated breath for the Top Blogs, to equalize out the post rankings between WordPress and PostRank a bit, I took a quick look at your analytics in our system and pulled up your top posts for the year according to PostRank. (The widget only looks at the last 50 posts, so this is for the whole year, based on total engagement points per post, which I’ve noted in brackets at the end of each title.)

  • Posterous Overtakes FriendFeed, Set to Overtake Delicious. – Nov. 4 (643)
  • Leaving HP. Back to Agency Life. – Apr. 20 (641)
  • You are Crazy not to Measure the ROI of Social Media! – Aug. 27 (435)
  • This is Why Google Scares the Sh*t Out of Companies – Oct. 29 (411)
  • On Being an Influencer and Marketing as Media – Sept. 25 (324)
  • You Do Not Have to be Social Media Famous. – Aug. 10 (284)
  • Brizzly is Funny. Obviously Wants to Be More than a Twitter Client. – Oct. 3 (270)
  • Top 5 Predictions for the Next 5 Years in Business Social Media – Dec. 21 (262)
  • Twitter for News and Facebook for Tech? – Oct. 17 (259)
  • So Shut the Tweet Up! – Aug. 7 (249)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 2% [?]

Posterous Overtakes FriendFeed, Set to Overtake Delicious.

Image representing Posterous as depicted in Cr...
Image via CrunchBase

Posterous has been gaining a lot of attention lately. Most people see it as a great way to fill that gap between a tweet and a blog. Some people see it as a next generation content management systems for the Web. Other people see it as a lifestream. Whatever you want to call it Posterous is gaining in popularity.

One of the biggest drivers of technology adoption is the group known as curators or collectors. This is the noise 10% on Twitter sharing all those links. It’s also the group that flocked to FriendFeed. It’s that same profile that made Delicious the early New Media breakout service 5 years ago. That is until it got acquired by Yahoo.

In my (not so) humble opinion, the biggest missed opportunity was all that valuable data Delicious users where creating. They tag, curate, comment on and share tens of thousands(?) of links a day, the very thing that has been, arguably, the biggest value of Twitter.

del.ff.post

But I’ve seen a trend lately. A lot of people I follow on Posterous and Twitter have started using Posterous for their curation and sharing instead of Delicious or FriendFeed.

Granted this isn’t a fair comparison because Posterous wasn’t intended to be a competitor to Delicious but between great features, a very slick bookmarklet and integration into services like Feedly it becomes a much more feature rich substitute for bookmarking.

On top of that Twitter favorites and Reader shares are also starting to replace this saving and curating activity. It’s still too early to tell if Delicious traffic is really headed down or if it’s just monthly movement but for what it’s worth my favorite bookmarking service Diigo has had slow but steady growth. Of course they have a ton of features Delicious doesn’t have.

Why is any of this random speculation and juxtaposition of traffic data worthy of a blog post? Because as I mentioned before, the curator/collector group is a powerful group if companies can tap into it like Twitter is and Delicious/Yahoo failed to.

What say you?

[UPDATE] It looks like Delicious managed to stay ahead of Posterous for the time being. But I wonder for how long?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

What the Heck is a Lifestream?

Waves of energy from the Lifestream
Image via Wikipedia

Yesterday at day 1 of BlogWorld, I sat in on Steve Rubel’s presentation on Lifestreaming and business. He had some solid observations and recommendations for businesses to become ubiquitous Online. If you’re familliar with Steve’s blog (if you’re not you need to be) or read this blog regularly then you’re familliar with most of what was discussed.

He talked about Posterous (which BTW is pronounced ‘pause-terous’ not ‘post-erous’ like I thought) and how he uses it for a hub and spoke model of publishing. I’ve never thought of Posterous as Lifestreaming. FriendFeed to me ia lifestreaming.

While Steve calls Posterous his Lifestream I don’t really see Steve using it like that. To me Lifestreaming implies a certain amount of frequency of posting. Steve has only posted 12 times this month to his Posterous account. His Twitter account has significantly more and FriendFeed has even more than that because it pulls in several of his Online services.Now my point isn’t to nitpick on Steve. Honestly my personal take that if Steve wants to call his site his life stream then that’s what it is. Heck, he could call his Twitter account, corporate bio page or his cat his Lifestream and that’d be fine with me (okay maybe not the cat).

But it raised an interesting question for me; What is Lifestreaming? So I asked Steve what he thought. The general consensus is that the practicle application of a what is a Lifestream is still being determined. But he did recommend the Lifestream Blog, which I found has a pretty good description of what a Lifestream is on it’s about page:

What is a Lifestream?

In it’s simplest form it’s a chronological aggregated view of your life activities both online and offline. It is only limited by the content and sources that you use to define it.

Where did Lifestreaming Originate?

Lifestreaming originated as a concept in 1996 as a project at Yale by Eric Freeman and David Galernter. The original concept has come to fruition with the ability to create and distribute content utilizing many new technologies. Here is an interview with David Galernter where he provides more insight.

At this point I don’t think it matters that much what people call their Lifestream, but like I’ve said before we have these debates in order to come to some comcensous and that standard definitions are important to moving the industry forward.

So I’d like to know how do you define Lifestreaming? What does it mean to you?

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

FriendFeed as Group RSS Reader [All Things M]

Image representing FriendFeed as depicted in C...
Image via CrunchBase

One of the things I love about FriendFeed is it’s versatility. Yes I know FriendFeed was acquired by Facebook and some are dooming it to extinction and I also realize thatsome people believe “RSS is dead.” Whatevs. I love FriendFeed and I love RSS even more. If I were kip I’d write a song about how much I love them. I’ll give them up when Web 5.0 pulls them from my cold dead hands. Anyway…

Have you ever wanted a way to share hundreds of feeds or even just a few feeds all in one place where everyone can view them? Sounds a lot like one the several dozen start pages out there doesn’t it? But what if you want people to be able to comment on a particular story there on the feed reader or export all of those feeds as one RSS feed?

This is where FriendFeed shines. I know several people that use FriendFeed as their only feed reader because of it’s many features. Today I wanted to create a massive RSS feed of hundreds of Marketing, Advertising and PR blogs. Why? I’m not really sure, I just did. j/k It’s a shared feed I created for an internal group as a resource but there’s no reason everyone can’t use it.

Introducing All Things M. (Apologies to Walt and Kara) Right now I have just added the top 150 AdAge Power 150 blogs, but plan on expanding that list as time goes on. Just for fun I also set up a TwitterFeed to feed it’s own All Things M Twitter account. I’m only sending 5 links every half hour to Twitter so it would be the best place for a sampling of the uber feed.(I’m also still working out some bugs in the RSS to FriendFeed to RSS to TwitterFeed to Twitter integration.)

If you’re on FriendFeed feel free to subscribe to the All Things M group. If you’re not on FriendFeed feel free to bookmark the page and check back often. If you’re feeling daring you could even subscribe to the all up RSS feed in your favorite feed reader but that’s a lot. Or if you prefer, follow the All Things M Twitter account.

Hope you find this useful. Let me know.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

How Do You Prioritize Your Social Media?

My social Network on Flickr, Facebook, Twitter...
Image by luc legay via Flickr

I’ve recently received a few inquiries from friends. They’ve noticed that I haven’t been as conversational on Twitter lately. I still highly value the conversations on Twitter I just don’t actively participate as much as I used to.

If you’ve read any of my previous posts you know that I’ve been busy. (That statement was made as yet another entry to the understatement of the year award).I have several mechanisms set up to allow me to continue to post *to* Twitter but you can’t automate conversation (nor should you try).

FriendFeed allows me to cross post items I share in Google Reader or songs I bookmark in Pandora from FriendFeed to Twitter. Posterous allows me to automagically post my short thoughts, pics, screen grabs and collections of ods and ends from Posterous to Twitter (and Flickr and YouTube and Facebook) which all end up in FriendFeed (BTW Mark Z, I know you’re reading this and give a rat’s ass what I think, but please don’t shut down FriendFeed, ever. kthnxby).

With my ever-shrinking, finite time I have to prioritize where and how I participate. I love Twitter. It is my social network of choice. But, for me, blogging is too valuable to ever give up. It’s become an integral part of my thinking process. It’s so bad that half the strategy docs I write for clients sound like blog posts. It’s an easy style for me. Even when I have something that’s not appropriate for the blog I have to send a a blog style email to someone to get it out of my head.

My hierarchy of social media goes something like this:

  • Google Reader
  • Blog/Posterous
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Yammer

There’s a very real long tail effect here. I start my day with Google Reader at 5:00 a.m. and check it constantly through the day, sharing the posts I find most interesting. Between my blog and my Posterous account I average 10-15 (or more) posts a week. Tweetdeck is running constantly at work and I check it frequently, I just don’t jump into many conversations. FriendFeed usually gets checked a few times a day and Facebook about once a day. LinkedIn and Yammer get maybe one or two visits a month.

What about you. Where are your social media priorities?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

An Interview with Retweet.com about Ripping off Tweetmeme.com

I just liked this picture

I just liked this picture

I often wonder if first mover advantage really means much anymore. Facebook wasn’t the first social network. Of course neither was MySpace. The iPod was not the first MP3 player. HP isn’t even close to being the first PC maker. Microsoft did not invent word processing software. Thomas Edison didn’t invent the light bulb.

Big Web companies do this all the time. Do you remember PubSub? Most of you probably don’t. It was what Google Alerts was before Google Alerts existed. Not long after Google launched Alerts PubSub joined the dead pool. (PubSub keeps talking about re-launching but it hasn’t happened yet.) We’ve seen this happen with the multiple Facebook redesigns. They consistently stole features from FriendFeed, until they finally just did the right thing and stole acquired FriendFeed.

Now as sites start to hyper focus in smaller and smaller niches we see this happening at an increasing pace. Tweetmeme took the retweet, a huge traffic driver for sites, especially blogs and ripped off Digg. I mean look at the two sites, how much difference is there really? The categories are basically the same and the buttons look really, really close.

So is it any surprise that Tweetmeme itself gets ripped off? Not really. With success comes competition. Louis Gray has a post about the two companies and how closely Retweet has “borrowed” from Tweetmeme. My thought is how much variation of rip-off does your rip-off need to be?

It reminds me of the Beastie Boys line “Only 12 notes, well, a man can play” This was a reference to the common practice of sampling used in Rap music.

It turns out that I know the guys that started Retweet. Retweet was built by a Boise based company Mesiab Labs.

First off I’d like to say I like the guys at Mesiab Labs but I’ve never done business with them or used any of their products so I can’t speak to their business dealings. They have a whole suite of products all built off of Twitter, and the few that aren’t leverage Twitter heavily.

So I asked Kevin Mesiab (CEO) and Tyson Quick (COO) if they wanted to respond to the media out there. Here’s what I got back. I make no allegations to the accuracy of any statements or if what they’ve done is right or wrong, but I did want to get their side of the story out there.

Tac,
Thanks for contacting us. Here is some Q & A from another interview inquiry for retweet.com below. The flurry of negative press after launch was somewhat to be expected, to break down the recent negative press you must first understand that tweetmeme is currently Europe’s largest website ( in aspects of traffic ), and their most promising widely used web platform since IMDB ( aquired by Amazon ). With that in mind we have looked into the source of nearly every article and even some blog commenter’s and have discovered that 3/4 of the journalist are located in Europe. To clearly see a picture that paints the story, take a look at the launch day demographics:

Here some Q & A
1. What is the ReTweet.com service.
Retweet is the official place to find real-time news on popular stories, images, and videos. We provide this service by scanning thousands of updates on the worlds most popular micro-blogging service, Twitter.com and with the help of users whom have added our retweet button to their blog or website. The word retweet has now become one of the most popular terms online and describes the action of repeating or sharing someones original tweet / story. We live in a world where for the first time in history real-time news is possible thanks to modern web technologies and crowd-sourced content creation, retweet is here to leverage this modern way of announcing and discovering news. We pride ourselves in providing “news for the people, by the people”.. meaning we do not decide what news finds it’s way to the home page of our site.

Retweet is still a baby ( thus the BETA ), expect to see many improvements over the next few months as we have great things in store. In the mean time, help us improve the service by adding our button to your blog.
NOTE: this clearly refers to us releasing many improvements ( many tweetmeme does not have ) and again mentions we are in BETA, most the bloggers failed to take note of this.

2. Some history behind the service ReTweet.com
Retweet.com is and always has been a side-project, as our software products are our priority. We purchased the Retweet.com domain name over 4 months ago for a substantial amount of money knowing exactly what we were going to do with it. At this time tweetmeme had around 200k monthly visitors.

3. What inspired for the creation of a service around Twitter.
I ( Tyson Quick – COO ) thought up the idea around the same time the plane crash happened in the Hudson river and it was first reported via TwitPic… real-time “crowd-sourced” news was being born. I’m also a fan of DIGG.com and this is where the initial inspiration came from NOTE: people are also trying very hard to not give credit to DIGG or Slashdot for pioneering this kind of service, as well as the look and feel of the platform. Why? Refer to the demographics ;) . Believe it or not, our team had this idea before we ever saw tweetmeme’s service.. although they were obviously the first ones to jump on the bandwagon.

4. What are the long term business plan and business model for ReTweet.com?
I cannot yet expose our business plans for retweet.com at this time, although we do have a well planned business model ( note: this does not rely on us ever passing tweetmeme in traffic ) – Although this is one of our long-term goals.

5.  What new features can we expect from ReTweet.com in coming days?
We will first be matching our competitors features 100% and then adding additional features we thought up ourselves. These features will be announced as they come out. But, I’ll assure you our users will like them and they Will greatly improve our existing platform.

6. How big or small is ReTweet.com, as a company?
Retweet.com is run by Mesiab Labs: Mesiab Labs is an LLC established and registered in Boise, Idaho. The company was initially funded by the now dissolved software company Easy Ad, owned and operated by Kevin Mesiab. The executive team consists of Kevin Mesiab ( CEO ), Tyson Quick ( COO ), and Sean Boone ( Director of Design ). Mesiab Labs builds market leading software and web based applications in various markets. We have a total of 4 people on Staff.  All our projects are self-funded, we have never accepted VC or outside funding.

7. What do you have to say about Twitter banning @retweet account.
We believe Twitter Banned our @retweet account because they are trying to trademark the term ( we have a pending trademark as well ) and because of their up-coming launch of their internal retweet function. From Twitter’s standpoint they might be worried about a 3rd party owning an account on their platform that is associated with the 2nd largest twitter term ( 2nd only to tweet )

8. What are your thoughts about Twitter getting the copyrights on Tweet and ReTweet? [We have read the story on mashable and other blogs about it, but wanted to know your perspective, so please do not give any links, instead give your opinion]
Well the term tweet has already been denied and we believe the same will occur with the term retweet.  We are confident that we will be granted it if anybody gets the trademark because of the related domain name and the fact that the domain has been registered for over two years before we purchased the rights to it.

9 How do you think, you stand out from your competitors?

We focused primarily on our categorization algorithm and it is indeed better then tweetmeme’s and will be constantly improving. NOTE: not one blogger mentioned this feature, although it should be the primary focus on a site like this. Right now we have not added many features that differ from our competitors, we first have to play the catch-up game. We have many features planned that have yet to be implemented. Right now the main thing that stands out about our company is our brand power and our extensive experience in online marketing. We also own our own url shortner rt.nu that is being implemented with retweet, as well as checkretweet.com on the user pages.

10. What about the claims that we “stole” tweetmeme’s code
retweet.com is not using a single line of tweetmeme’s code, 1 month before launch our main developer on this project was testing tweetmeme’s button on our server and dissecting how it worked.. ( competitive analysis ). Tweetmeme then contacted TechCrunch UK whom released the story as a way to discredit and keep users from using our service, ( keep in mind it hadn’t even been released yet ). You can read that here http://rt.nu/t_wy , notice the very two sided comments. The database table that contained the name tweetmeme was simply a dumb choice of one of our developers to make it easy for him to remember… Again we are not using any code of tweetmeme’s. Although, they are indeed trying to make the public believe this.

11. If you want to tell something else to our readers, you can tell
Retweet.com will remain an extremely social site, holding monthly competitions, etc. We plan to build an engaged community, not just a news feed that lets you add a button.

Photo Credit: Balakov

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Is Twitter Shopping for a Business Model?

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

VentureBeat has an article on Twitter and their move to launch premium corporate accounts. One thing that caught my eye:

Twitter to roll out commercial accounts this year | VentureBeat

He also wouldn’t rule out the possibility of further acquisitions, acknowledging that Twitter had talked to FriendFeed about acquiring the company before it was bought by Facebook.

“We’re at a point where even though we’re only two years old, acquisitions are definitely possible,” Stone said.

Twitter’s already done one before. It bought Summize last year to build out Twitter’s search capabilities, a move that seems to have turned out well.

Why did I find this so interesting? Because I made a prediction back in March that Twitter would acquire it’s business model. They’re sitting on loads of cash and no sustainable business model (premium accounts will not support Twitter, it’s just easy money).

New Comm Biz » Will Twitter build or acquire a business model?

With an open API, more buzz than most think they deserve and a boat load of VC cash I think eventually Twitter will go on a shopping spree. They’ve already demonstrated the ability and desire to do this with their purchase of Summize and Values of N (while the latter was really just a talent acquisition).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Why Would You NOT Blog?

Playing with the TypeDrawing app.
Image by Tac Anderson via Flickr

Following yesterday’s post (and months of posts really) about how easy Posterous makes blogging, why would you NOT blog? Seriously it’s so freaking easy?

If sending an email is too tough, check out Tumblr. Pulling an RSS feed doesn’t get any easier. Check out my music blog http://tacanderson.tumblr.com/. The only thing I have to do is use the bookmark song feature for songs I like in Pandora or tags certain bookmarks in my Diigo as ‘music’.

It doesn’t get any easier than that!!!

I know, you think you have to have something really important to say. That’s just plain stupid. Start writing and posting and you’ll come up with good stuff to say. You’re not going for a book deal you’re learning and engaging with people. It’s the online version of what you do every day.

You don’t even need a blog to blog. Flickr, FriendFeed, Delicious, StumbleUpon and even Google Reader shared items have “blogs”.

If for some reason you still don’t have a blog start with Delicious. Start bookmarking and curating interesting content. We can work with you from there.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

FriendFeed is Facebooks Summize. It’s All About Search.

Image representing Summize as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

No one listens to me. You snooze you loose.

I obviously have no idea why FriendFeed took the FaceBook deal. I’m willing to bet that many of the smart people below are right.

What I do know:

Facebook has been stealing FriendFeed features for the past year.

Facebook will need better search. FriendFeed has the best search engine out there IMHO.

FriendFeed DOES NOT need the money. Paul could have continued to self fund the site and many investors would have easily lined up to throw their money behind such amazing talent. This leads me to believe as others have stated that they sold for some heavy amounts of equity shares.

(Update 1: TechCrunch has more details on the make up of the deal)

The big question is what happens to FriendFeed? My bet is that FriendFeed will become to Facebook what Summize has become to Twitter. (For those that may not know Summize was a Twitter search engine that is now http://search.twitter.com. aka the front page [if you're logged out])

(Update 2) As I think more about this it occurred to me that Paul and team are the guys behind Gmail. This means Facebook could build their own mail system to compete with MySpace mail that has yet to roll out beyond a few users.  Either way, things just got interesting again at Facebook. Just when I was ready to write them off.

I’m sure this will be covered in depth for the rest of the week so instead of recapping all the smart thinking on the topic, here’s some links:

  • Facebook makes a play and acquires Friendfeed, a sharing and aggregation tool that helps people find out what their friends are doing. Read Friendfeed’s announcement, and Facebook’s blog post. A few months ago the Facebook and Twitter deal fell apart, and Facebook knows it must open its community to the open web –not just behind a login in order to benefit from generating revenues through advertising and search advertising.

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

  • What does this mean for my FriendFeed account? FriendFeed.com will continue to operate normally for the time being. We’re still figuring out our longer-term plans for the product with the Facebook team. As usual, we will communicate openly about our plans as they develop — keep an eye on the FriendFeed News group for updates.

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

  • So what’s happening to this Valley? Is it as dire a situation as it sometimes seems? Are we really going to end up with four mega-companies: FaceBook, Google, Microsoft and Apple? Because if Google or Microsoft can weasel their way into acquiring Twitter, that’s sure how it will seem. If the IPO market continues to be closed, and innovative companies can only knock on doors 1 through 4, that’s not a good thing.

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

  • Facebook has purchased social sharing service FriendFeed. Financial terms of the deal were not released, although FriendFeed had raised just over $5 million in venture funding. Facebook has hinted in the past that it was interested in making an acquisition. In raising $200 million from Russian investor Digital Sky Technologies in late May, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the new cash opened the possibility of “strategic options.” And Facebook also reportedly made a bid for Twitter last fall.

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

  • Earlier today, rumors started to appear that FriendFeed had been acquired by Facebook. We now have confirmation that this is indeed true. Neither Facebook nor FriendFeed released any exact details about the acquisition, but we’ll keep this story updated as we learn more details about this acquisition. According to a post by Bret Taylor on the FriendFeed blog, FriendFeed will continue to operate normally for the time being while the two companies figure out the long-term plans.

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

  • Facebook has acquired FriendFeed, we’ve learned. We’re gathering details now. At this point details on the acquisition are still very sparse, but it’s clearly a good match. Over the last year or so, Facebook has “borrowed” quite a few of features that FriendFeed popularized, including the ‘Like’ feature and an emphasis on real-time news updates.

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

  • Facebook just got bought… * the best social search platform on the web, hands down * a site that has captured the heart and soul of many (not all) geeks, something they need to do to stay in the vanguard * an incredibly smart, talented team that will bring rapid innovation to Facebook and make it even stronger

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

  • Details on the Facebook acquisition of Friendfeed story that we broke earlier today are still coming in. But we had a chance to talk with Friendfeed cofounder Bret Taylor (pictured right) and Facebook VP Products Chris Cox a few minutes ago to discuss the deal and the product integration plans going forward.

    tags: friendfeed, facebook

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Who I Think Should Buy FriendFeed and Bit.ly

LONDON, ENGLAND - MARCH 25: In this photo illu...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

If I were Acxiom I’d be going on a social media buying spree. Companies like Bit.ly or FriendFeed. Match what they know with real time behavior data. The great thing about URL shorteners like Bit.ly is they permeate the walled gardens like Facebook and the great thing about FriendFeed is it aggregates all that great data.

For decades, data companies like Experian and Acxiom have compiled reams of information on every American: Acxiom estimates it has 1,500 pieces of data on every American, based on information from warranty cards, bridal and birth registries, magazine subscriptions, public records and even dog registrations with the American Kennel Club.

I’ve been doing some thinking on this recently; it’s one thing to collect data on people without them realizing it (most people don’t understand what browser cookies are or exactly what they do) it’s quite another to be able to collect data that users are actively sharing, in realtime.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 6057 access attempts in the last 7 days.