Your Personal Brand is Not About You

Personal branding is not about you. It requires a lot of hard work, persistence in the face of repeated failure and the confidence to take a stand for something but despite the blood sweat and tear you put in it’s not about you.

Building your platform

Building a recognizable brand, even within your community or industry, is hard but it’s not as hard as it used to be. To build a personal brand you need a platform. Platforms were usually built around some sort of fame; a successful book, TV or radio show, something. In order to get there in the first place you needed publicists, agents and teams of PR people working their magic to get you booked on talk shows, news appearances and speaking gigs. All of these things still work but they have always come with a large price tag.

Today, the Internet is the only platform you need. You need a blog, a strong social media presence, you can self publish a book, start an Internet radio show, podcast or online video series. It’s still hard work but anyone willing to put in the work can do it. In short you don’t have to be special to be special.

Personal Spam

Because so many barriers have been removed there is a gold rush of people looking to establish their personal brand. In the attempt to create a personal brand what usually results is personal spam. It’s gotten so bad I normally don’t even like talking about personal branding. There are too many egomaniacs, snake oil salesmen (and women) and get rich quick schemers.

The truth is personal brand building is not about you. Your personal brand lives in the minds of the people who support you. Your Facebook friends and fans, your Twitter followers, your blog and book readers and in general everyone who believes in you that isn’t your mom.

Who are your friends?

If you want to really build a personal brand quit focusing on yourself. It’s not about you; it’s about your supporters, target audience, stakeholders, consumers, network and all those other terms companies use to describe people. For the sake of my personal sense of humanity we’ll be referring to them as friends from here on out.

My friends are the reason I do what I do. I have a few unique talents, we all do, and I use my unique talents to help my friends. I share my talents and my friends tell their friends. My friends built my platform for me.

Don’t be someone you’re not

The foundation of your platform should be you. All those things that make up who you are. Don’t be someone your not or act a certain way. That’s disingenuous and people can tell.

Be the megaphone for your friends

Highlight your friends. Highlight the people that helped you build your platform. Don’t just thank them, showcase them.

Get over yourself

You are not that big a deal. I don’t care who you are you are replaceable and beyond  our little corner of the Internet no one knows who you are.

If you’re standing alone on your platform or if the people standing with you aren’t your friends, you don’t have a personal brand you have personal spam.

Join the New Comm Biz Facebook Page or follow the Twitter account.

Photo credit jurvetson

Dan Schawbel, author of Me 2.0and the Personal Branding Blog asked me to write an article for the Personal Branding Magazine. I ended up writing two and this was the one I saved for you :)

Popularity: 10% [?]

Tagged with:
 

3 Reasons Why Social Media is Killing Search

The two main drivers of search are, news and finding something you already know exists.

I recently wrote about how in an apples to oranges comparison bitly was challenging Google. One commenter thought I was a loon or a complete idiot for trying to compare the two. In all fairness I may not have explained why the two are worthy of being compared. bitly and Google both have the same purpose: deliver you to a useful website. That’s it. The difference is that one is performed by search queries the other is initiated by a recommendation.

Read/Write Web reports on some coverage from HitWise

Social networking climbed fast this year, and Hitwise says it just peaked over search for a few days during the communication frenzy of Christmas. Take that, Larry and Sergey – Mark and Ev are right behind you.

Social Recommendations

When news breaks we are turning to search engines less and less. We are turning to each other and the real time results of social networks more and more. For breaking news I know that I’ll find a relevant link on Twitter and an outdated news story on Google. I only see one reason this trend will stop (which I’ll get to in my last point).

Better Curating

With so much data out there, curating is going to be a huge trend this year and good curators will be in high demand. The tools we have now for bookmarking (delicious & diigo), favoriting (Google reader and Twitter), listing (Twitter and Listorous), and storing offline (Instapaper and Evernote) are constantly getting better making the need to go to a search engine irrelevant.

Lack of Search Innovation

This is the biggest problem and the thing that Google, Bing and every startup in search is trying to fix. The reason that Bing and Google are tripping over each other to integrate real time data is they are trying to get us all to come to them first when we here of breaking news. And I think that over time it will pay off. With all the noise and rising levels of spam in social media search has an advantage. If they can bring you immediate, real time results, they have a chance since they already have a pretty good handle on filtering spam.

Of course they’ll also get there by making some key acquisitions this year. Who are your bets on the first real time search starups to be acquired?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 15% [?]

Tagged with:
 
LONDON - FEBRUARY 03: (FILE PHOTO)  In this ph...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

From the moment that Marketing was created the battle over customer privacy and spam began. It may not have been called privacy or spam when the first salesperson knocked on someone’s door during dinner but the same thinking was in play.

Few companies have fought more battles between Privacy and Spam than Microsoft. A recent blog post by Windows Live Mail highlights this:  Fighting the war on spam

Why do people send spam in the first place? It’s simple: for the money. Spam is big, big business. Much of it is also illegal, but, unfortunately, that hasn’t kept people from sending it.

Believe me, spam is a battle. Spammers won’t ever quit, and they are very clever. Spammers are constantly finding new ways to exploit the services that we provide to our customers, to abuse the very system that you use every day to communicate with your friends and family and to conduct your personal business. But we won’t quit, either.

Customer information is possibly the most valuable substance on earth. The core of marketing since it’s beginnings, stemming from government subsidized, post World War II research, has been customer data. In the beginning the first breakthrough was demographic data. Demographic data excited and terrified people because of it’s implications, both to the new field of Marketing but also on privacy. Demographic data terrified a World still recovering from the Nazi threat.

Today’s social networks create data that makes demographic data dated and benign. And this scares people. Mark Zuckerberg recently made the statement that Privacy doesn’t matter anymore which has created some great debate.

Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote about the importance of privacy Why Facebook is Wrong: Privacy Is Still Important

Privacy is a fundamental human right and while that may seem less true when we’re operating on corporate turf like Facebook, Facebook used to be based on privacy. Why give it up so easily? (Isn’t it a cause for concern that so much of our civic interaction now goes on through this and other corporate channels?)

It’s very hard to believe that the hundreds of millions of mainstream Facebook users are wanting to throw their privacy out the window – and if Facebook believes they are, why not just ask them clearly?

Mike Arrington writes about the illusion of privavcy we’ve been living under for years. Ok You Luddites, Time To Chill Out On Facebook Over Privacy

The fact is that privacy is already really, really dead. Howard Lindzon nailed it the other day when he said “Equifax, Transunion, Capital One, American Express and their cousins raped our privacy,” Everything we do, everything we buy, everywhere we go is tracked and sitting in a database somewhere. Our location via our phone, or our car GPS. Our credit card transactions. Everything. Honestly, a picture of you taking a bong hit in college is mice nuts compared to the mountain of data that is gathered and exploited about every single one of us every single day. You just don’t really see that other stuff because those companies don’t like to talk about the data their gathering.

Neither Marshall or Mike are wrong. Privacy is important and we do live in a World where privacy isn’t what we think it is. For digitally savvy people like you and me that are very aware of and (relatively) comfortable with the amount of data we have out there this isn’t a big problem. But most people have no idea about privacy and spam. The rise of worms and security exploits in social networks is already a huge problem because most people don’t know to not click on weird links. This only fuels the fear around privacy.

Some companies live on this fear and many more profit from it. Hence the recent partnership with McAfee and Facebook. Both companies make money on this deal. Better Security through Software | Facebook

One of the best defenses against security threats is a good offense, and we want to help you take the offensive by having the latest security software installed on your computer. Today, we are announcing a year-long partnership with McAfee to offer all 350 million people who use Facebook the ability to download a six-month subscription to McAfee security software at no cost, along with a special discount once the six months are over.

This only exacerbates the problem of privacy vs. spam. Facebook (and any Web company) make more money the more information they can get you to expose. This opens up users to the risk of spam and the risk of viruses which Facebook (and other Web companies) need to control in order to keep users (read MySpace) but they also make money by fighting it. It’s the arms dealer making money selling weapons to both sides.

Hence the never ending battle. The only thing we can do is be smart about our data and approach the battle with eyes wide open. After all it’s our information the battle is being waged over, be smart with it.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 2% [?]

It’s no secret that mom’s have embraced social networking probably faster  than any other segment over the last 2 years. You couldn’t throw a stick at a local PTA meeting without hitting a mom with a blog. And they have swarmed to Facebook.

In fact when we moved into our new house all the moms on the block new we were there and the ages of our kids within hours of our meeting our neighbor who then posted to her Facebook account. (I think our block has a group or something. I should probably check that out.)

There’s even new research showing the sharp rise of social media moms:

How Moms Feel About Social Media
About 63% of moms used Facebook, Twitter and blogs this year, a whopping increase from 11% in 2006. The survey also found that the kinds of media moms spent See all stories on this topic

Facebook The Movie. I’ve heard about this rumor for a while and refused to believe it. I mean seriously this is ridiculous. But then today this alert shows up claiming that the director of Fight Club, Seven and Benjamin Button. What do all of those movies have in common: Brad Pitt

Movie About the Creation of Facebook May Be Directed by Fincher
David Fincher, director of such hit movies as “Fight Club,” “Seven,” and “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” is considering taking on the Facebook movie. See all stories on this topic

I’m calling it now:

Zuckerberg will be played by Brad Pitt!

You think moms like Facebook now? Wait until they watch the movie staring Brad Pitt. Twilight ain’t got nothing on Facebook the Movie.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Ask, and TweetDeck Giveth

Image representing TweetDeck as depicted in Cr...

Image by via CrunchBase

I love TweetDeck. There are very few apps that I would declare a love affair with. If it wasn’t for TweetDeck there is no way I could be as effective, efficient and engaged as I am on Twitter with 1400+ followers. Dividing multiple followers into multiple columns is a true life saver.

It also has brilliant integration with TwitScoop (Twitter search) and 12seconds, if you’re into video.

I just have two problems with it.

1 – I run multiple laptops and have Tweetdeck installed on all of them. I also have multiple groups set up. Trying to go back and recreate each of those groups is a huge pain. Being able to synch multiple Tweetdecks would be a huge advantage.

So I asked

tweetdeck1

2 – I run multiple Twitter accounts. This forces me to keep using Twhirl to manage my TechBoise account. I really wish that TweetDeck let me manage multiple accounts from one app. So I asked again

tweetdeck2

Today I got a response from TweetDeck

tweetdeck reply

A – Great response, they just sealed a user for life.

B – Their Twitter stream is filled with responses just like this. They have to have someone full time just listening and responding to requests.

So if you’re a Twitter user, I highly recommend TweetDeck and if you have any requests, just ask @TweetDeck

What features do you want to see in TweetDeck?

Technorati Tags: ,
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 8% [?]

Tagged with:
 

What if you don’t live in Silicon Valley?

Boise Downtown

Image via Wikipedia

Building Social Media Communities in the Real World.

Some of my astute readers (if I have any left) may have noticed that I haven’t posted here in almost a month. Don’t think that this means I haven’t been blogging.

OK and no I haven’t been blogging on my HP blog, Marketing Impressions. And no, I haven’t been contributing to the Conversations Matter blog (sorry Michael Brito).

But I still hold out that I’m not a slacker. I have been building a tech/social media community… in Boise, Idaho.

Many of you know that I am an Entrepreneur in Residence at Highway 12 Ventures. I of course still have my day job at HP. But you may not know (although you probably do) that I also run the TechBoise blog, hold monthly events as well as regular Boise area Tweetups.

Those of you who don’t live in a major tech sector no what I’m talking about when I say that Silicon Valley isn’t the *real world* (heck many of you who do live in SV know what I’m talking about).

When I started preaching Blogs and New Media Marketing in Boise, 4 long years ago, I was ahead of the market in California, and if you’re ahead of the market in California, you’re waaaay ahead of the market in Boise, Idaho.

When I first Joined Twitter, 2 years ago the only other person from Boise on Twitter that I knew of was Sarah Lewis. Today I follow hundreds of people from Boise and the surrounding area and in fact they are some of the most active Twitter users I know.

Smaller markets have a distinct advantage as well as a distinct disadvantage when it comes to building social media communities.

Smaller markets are easier to navigate

Smaller markets are more accessible. Want to talk to our mayor, local investors or local CEO’s? No problem. 99% of the time you can get a meeting with them with one simple introduction.

There are usually only two degrees of separation between anyone who’s anyone in second tier markets. Boise’s just not that big and people are more easy going.

Smaller markets have less critical mass

One of the problems smaller markets have is we just don’t have the sheer volume of tech savvy people that Silicon Valley, Seattle, Austin or Boston have.

We don’t have a Google or Microsoft in our areas. We don’t have hundreds of VC’s clamoring around us. We don’t have A-listers, or even B-listers.

But that’s ok with us, because we don’t have 2 hour long commutes. We’re friends (real life friends) with the other tech people in our community. And our one VC firm will meet with anyone who emails them.

My Advice for 2nd Tier Markets

So what do you do if you want to grow your tech/social media savvy community and you’re not in Silicon Valley?

What about those of you from other second tier markets? What do you do?

Technorati Tags: ,,,,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 11% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Treating your best users like your worst. [Twitter]

epiphany

Twitter has imposed a new follow limit on it’s users. You only get to follow 2,000 people. Most of you may be thinking, “Seriously? Who wants to follow 2,000 people anyway?” How realistic is it follow 2,000 people? That’s just too much noise right?

Not as noisy as you might think

As of today I currently follow 1,059 people? How is that possible? Obviously I don’t directly engage with every comment my Twitter friends make. I don’t have to. Not every tweet is meant to be engaged with (I would argue most of them aren’t).

And as more brands start using Twitter to engage with their customers many of them are going to need to be able to follow everyone that follows them, even if that number exceeds 2,000.

I use tools

TweetDeck

TweetDeck let’s me track Tweets by groups. All Tweets are on the far right. All my Boise friends are in the next column and replies (tweets containing @tacanderson) are in the next column. So really following a whole grip of people isn’t as hard as one might think.

The algorithm did it

So while I don’t have a problem with Twitter limiting the amount of people you follow I have a problem with the way it was implemented. Steve O’Hear has a post about Twitter using an algorithm to limit the number of followers.

The problem is that there doesn’t seem to be much algo behind their rithm. Spammers follow a lot of people for the exposure but don’t get many (if any) people following them back. It doens’t seem to me like it would be very hard to build into this “algorithm” a follow to following ratio.

The result is that Twitter ends up treating their most valuable users, their hubs, (see previous post on scale-free networks) exactly like they treat their worst users, the spammers.

It seems like there’s a marketing lesson in there somewhere ;)

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 16% [?]

Tagged with:
 

What do I Twitter about?


If you’re on Twitter I suggest you do a Tweet Cloud. It’s very telling. Tweet Cloud even shows you the number of times you used each word.

This is my Tweet Cloud without the @ replies. If you use del.icio.us you can also mash up your del.icio.us tags into your Tweet Cloud.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 10% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Scoble Throws in the Twitter Towel

I just saw Robert Scoble present at the Media Relations Summit and a big part of his presentation was about Twitter. Then today this popped up.

Twitter

Robert Scoble Scobleizer I just told @ev to turn off my autofollow script. 20,000 followers is enough. I’m seeing one new Tweet every second, I can’t deal with more.
half a minute ago from im Icon_star_full reply to Scobleizer

I have no idea how overwhelming it must be to try and follow 20,000 people. Obviously most of us won’t even try. I just passed the 300 mark.

The great thing about Social Media is that it will scale as far as you want/need it to. Then you back off. Then when/if you’re ready, you start scaling again. The same is true of people and companies.

Start small and scale it organically. You don’t have to drink from the fire hose.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 11% [?]

Bad Behavior has blocked 6064 access attempts in the last 7 days.