Brizzly Stays Busy: Adds Twitter Lists and Facebook

I’ve been playing around with Brizzly for about a month now. I like it – a lot. I’m not ready to ditch TweetDeck as my main app yet but Brizzly is perfect for my netbook. If you’re not into using massive AIR apps like TweetDeck for whatever reason Brizzly might also be for you.

There’s a lot of little things about Brizzly that make it fun and with the addition of Lists and Facebook it just went from fun to functional.

Brizzly ads Facebook

Brizzly has most of the functionality a full client like TweetDeck has, it just does things differently. The biggest difference about Brizzly is that it always relies on a single column view. So going to Facebook or one of your lists or DM’s or mentions takes you to a different column view each time. If you’re jumping around between columns, lists and replies a lot this could be a problem as your browser has to reload every time. This is why I stick with TweetDeck at work.

If it weren’t for browser latency I could easily see myself switching to Brizzly full time.

Facebook in Brizzly

The first thing I did was hook up Facebook. Like every other Twitter client that integrates Facebook, there’s not much you can do other than leave comments in your stream or comment on or like others Facebook posts. The one disadvantage compared to TweetDeck is that you can’t comment simultaneously to both Twitter and Facebook. I don’t use that feature much, in fact I don’t have Facebook hooked up to TweetDeck at all. But I like how in Brizzly it’s hidden unless I want to go to it.

Brizzly Lists

Twitter Lists is the main reason I could see myself moving away from TweetDeck. I spend all day in columns I’ve created for various reasons/ If I made lists for all of them then checking them in Brizzly becomes easy. Once every client implements lists it also makes it super easy to move around between clients.

My next step is to add multiple Twitter accounts and once I turn my TweetDeck columns into lists I may actually try and use Brizzly exclusively for a week. I’ll let you know how it goes.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 
Brizzly

Brizzly

On my netbook I don’t run many programs. No AIR apps like TweetDeck. So I’ve been using Seesmic’s Web app, but was very intrigued when I heard about Brizzly.

I’m really liking Brizzly so far. It’s nice to see a startup with personality.

One of their features is an explanation for trending topics. This has to be human generated. Check out this explanation:

#ImTwitaddicted
A hashtag started by Alyssa Milano and picked up by her fans. Who knew Alyssa Milano had fans?

I found it interesting that Brizzly had me choose a username as part of my sign up process. Why is this Weird? Because “Twitter clients” act as a pass-through and usually just use your  Twitter username.

A quick look around shows that Brizzly is a product of Thing Labs. Run by some some ex-Googlers.

Brizzly obviously has bigger plans than that. I’m really excited to see what they come out with.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Twitter is the Internets Water Cooler

An office water cooler with a reusable 5-gallo...
Image via Wikipedia

You can’t monitor the whole Internet. Nobody can, not even Google. So what do you do? It’s obvious that you can’t ignore it? You need to be monitoring something.

“But I don’t have budget for fancy monitoring tools.” You don’t need any budget. There are dozens of free or nearly free tools to use but you could probably just monitor Twitter if you had to.The easiest and cheapest way is set up your team with TweetDeck, let it run in the background at work and run a search for your keywords.

I’m not advocating that you only monitor Twitter (and the above solution only works while TweetDeck is running) but I think if you only did one thing, it would be to monitor Twitter? Why? Why not blogs or set up alerts?

Twitter is the water cooler of the Internet. One could argue that it’s becoming the World’s Water Cooler. But they’d be wrong. The World has many Internet Water Coolers.

Facebook is the World’s Largest Water cooler.

The Facebook Water Cooler started off as a brand of water bottles exclusively sold at college. It quickly became the favorite water cooler brand in the US and is quickly become the favorite at all of the Internet’s international offices as well. After a redesign of the water cooler people complained that it released too much water too quickly but eventually they got used to it. People do get really uncomfortable when they run into both their x-girlfriend and their mom at the Facebook Water Cooler.

Twitter is the World’s Noisiest Water Cooler.

The Twitter Water Cooler is not the largest but is by far the noisiest water cooler in the office. This is the water cooler that people who don’t drink water hate having a desk to close to and put up signs outside their cubicle wall reminding people that there are people working asking conversations be kept to a minimum. The Twitter Water Cooler used to run out of water all the time but it’s been much better latley. They also have really, really small cups.

FriendFeed is the the Geekiest Water Cooler.

The FriendFeed Water Cooler is where IT support hangs out and bitches about everyone else. It has superior filtration. State of the art cooling and is more energy efficient. In fact they recently implemented new water reclamation from the air but only a few people know how to use it.

Internet vs The World

While there are many water coolers for what’s happening in the World Twitter is the one where everything on the Internet passes through. If there’s big news in the office everyone, including PR, and HR go over to the Twitter Water Cooler to find out what’s up an then go back to their water coolers to talk about it.

So some of you are rightfully thinking, “Tac the Internet *is* the World.” Yes it is. But many things in the World don’t raise to any significant level of awareness on the Internet. My wonderful wife spends more time on Facebook than any other Internet site. She get’s news about what’s happening in our neighborhood, community and in our friends and families lives. That stuff doesn’t make it on Twitter and you don’t need to know about it.

US Airways Flight 1549 Plane Crash Hudson in N...
Image by davidwatts1978 via Flickr

But if a plane crashes, a celebrity dies (or one allegedly dies), a nation revolts or your marketing campaign tanks, the Twitter Water Cooler knows about it. If you’re going to monitor only one thing right now, Twitter will get you 90% of what you want faster than anything.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Why URL Shorteners Are Important

bit.ly FAIL blowfish
Image by bpedro via Flickr

There’s probably hundreds of URL shorteners now. Seriously, I don’t think that’s an exaggeration. They’re really easy to build (there’s even a WordPress plugin that makes them out of your blog URL) and they are proving invaluable to content publishers. (NYT article on shorter URLs)

Tinyurl was the first shortener. It predates Twitter and was primarily used by IT guys who had to email those hideously long URL’s you get from large enterprise sites. Then with Twitter and other microblogging services the need to save those precious characters drove the advent of really short shorteners. But Bit.ly quickly changed all of that. Now URL shorteners offer the ability to get real time stats on the nemer of clicks, the number of times a link get’s re-shared and even the conversations that are happening around your link.

Bit.ly is still my favorite service. Here’s a bonus tip, you can hack any Bit.ly link someone else share’s to see the tracking metrics of that link. Take any Bit.ly link like this one http://bit.ly/9be3i and add info/ in the middle like so http://bit.ly/info/9be3i. (Note: Bit.ly has been upgrading their service so this may not work perfectly but you should be able to get the idea.)

Many people out there hate URL shorteners. Spammers use them to hide malicious or affiliate links. Another legitimate concern is what happens *when* some of these services start going under? The Web will be littered with hundreds, thousands or even millions of dead links.

I love URL shorteners and think they are going to be indispensable to content producers and marketers. URL shorteners enable you to track your content (via the link) wherever the Web stream takes it. You can track engagement, pass-along and .

I also think that since you know where your content ends up, URL shorteners will help solve the comment tracking/re-aggregation that plagues all of us bloggers. (That’s going to be a very messy problem however).

What do you think, do URL shorteners make the Web better or worse?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Media Consumption: Scoble vs Rubel

I consume, filter and sort a lot of information everyday (this is an understatement) and I don’t even consume as much as some people that I know. If you look at Robert Scoble or Steve Rubel, I pale in comparison.

I’ve written before about the need to build the skill of juggling the flow of information. One thing I have  noticed however is that there are different ways to become a prosumer of information.

I look at the way Robert Scoble and Steve Rubel manage their information. Please note that these are just my observations from watching Robert and Steve and following them online for the past 5 years. They (or you) may disagree with my assessment of their media consumption practices.

Robert Scoble drinks from a fire hose. When he gets on a new service or social network he figures out how to follow as many people as he can.

Robert uses other early adopters and available tools (video on how he uses TweetDeck) to bring information to him but relies on his brain to do most of the filtering knowing that important themes and trends will reoccur.

This approach has it’s advantages and disadvantages. Robert knows that his brain will pick up trends less obvious to most. He’s almost subconsciously seeing patterns. This isn’t perfect or scientific by any means but it has worked well for Robert. This is also a much more time consuming way to approach data consumption although it’s done in the background during *spare cycles*. Some Most people find this too overloading.

Characteristics of Scoble Consumption:

  • Multiple sources
    • There is no limit to the number of Sources you use. Wherever you can get the highest level of raw content.
    • To achieve this you will also follow just about anyone sacrificing signal for data.
  • Multiple Devices.
    • You have no preference between Mac or PC. You run multiple laptops, mobile mobile devices and whatever’s the newest AIR app.

Steve Rubel on the other hand chooses to rely on tools as a primary filtering tool. His Jedi like mastery of Gmail and GoogleReader is truly awe-inspiring. I’d love to watch over his shoulder one morning as he goes through his morning routine. (Steve needs to at least compile all of his posts into an ebook or something)

Steve uses people as filters as well, keying in on certain influencers who he knows will pass on a much higher signal to noise ratio. Once the tools and people have brought the content to Steve this is when his highly analytical skills to sort through the remaining noise. He’s obviously very good at this given that his position at Edelman is basically to do this and report on important trends. He’s basically Edelman’s lighting rod. (Pretty much the coolest job in the World IMO)

This approach also has it’s own advantages and disadvantages. Taking the time to master the tools and set them up is probably more time intensive initially but I’m assuming pays off in less manual filtering. The other risk is that some of the finer nuances a Scoble like approach may bring could be lost through the initial filtering. Also as tools change so fast in this space the switching cost of moving to a new tool is pretty high, which is why Steve still prefers email as his master dashboard.

Characteristics of Rubel Consumption:

  • Multiple sources but heavy influencer filtering
    • You are on FriendFeed, Twitter, Facebook, etc, etc but are in no hurry to follow thousands of people. You rely on select people to provide up front filtering.
  • A preference for an integrated OS
    • Whether it’s Mac or PC you live and work on one laptop and one phone. All your tools integrate together seamlessly (Steve’s a Mac BTW)
  • You experiment with the latest shiny web app but are slow to integrate it into your system.

Ultimately I think that it’s understanding how your brain works. Neither of these approaches are going to work perfectly for everyone. I think it’s an important part of the juggling process to figure out what works for you and what doesn’t and it does take time.

I think I tend to lean more towards the Scoble approach for consuming media (just not at his level) and more of a Rubel approach for creating content (ie I lean on a lot more tools for creation). My brain does the filtering in the middle but I make up for it in the creation process. I also work to integrate the creation with consumption. This results in a lot of “thinking out loud” blog and Twitter posts but that’s also part of the filtering process for me.

What about you? What tools or tricks do you use to consume and filter the growing amounts of data?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 
Image representing Zemanta as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

I am a big fan of Zemanta. I have lots of Google alerts set up and I had been wanting to try Posterous for a while but wasn’t sure what I would use it for. Then when Zemanta released support for Gmail I came up with the idea of mashing up all those previously mentioned services.

I’ve been using the alerts for Twitter, FriendFeed and Facebook. I usually come up with nonsense titles based on a combo of various articles in the alerts. I’ve been doing it for a while now and today I got a shout out from Zemanta’s community manager in Twitter and their blog.

gandalfar:@tacanderson great work on your posterous hacks – http://bit.ly/1GXF :) about 3 hours ago from TweetDeck

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tagged with:
 

The Life and Death of Darcy Validate by Twitter

This isn’t the easiest post for me to write but I wanted to share an idea I had about two years ago, that I still think is a good idea, as well as some lessons I learned along the way.

The Birth of Darcy

Darcy was a code name for a project that Rich Breton and I came up with about 2 years ago. The genesis came from a phone conversation that I had with Ben Quintana while trying to set up a meeting. After about 4 or 5 back and forth emails Ben just called me. As we were getting off the phone Ben made some comment about how there should be a better way to do a meeting set up instead of emails. I made some comment like, “Yeah I’ll just blog it and tag it for you.”

It was at that moment that I had an epiphany. Bloggers talked all the time back and forth via blogs, RSS, Google and Technorati Alerts and email was seldom employed. Twitter was just starting up and that was already having an effect.

I was also in the middle of my 4th or 5th Outlook meltdown that year, which again resulted in me loosing everything. I began wondering why you couldn’t create an internal messaging system based on *blog like* post that alerted people via tags, like project name, their name or topic tag, then delivered those posts via RSS. You could even allow people to respond within the application which would post back to the original thread like a comment.

We worked up multiple ways that this could be built as an internal enterprise application (using Google’s mini search box, setting up system wide auto-tags, etc), as a SaaS version or as an integration into Google Apps, we were even looking at integrating into Outlook.

The Death of Darcy

Ultimately like most *good ideas* we never got off the ground, (not fully at least).  I was in the middle of my MBA and was consulting to bring in some income. Rich was trying to pick up side projects that both brought in some money and simultaneously helped build the CMS we were working on. He was also trying to do it all in a brand new language to him (Ruby on Rails).

Ultimately we tried to do too much. We had too many distractions and ultimately we both got a little burnt out and finally called it quits. At that time HP was recruiting me and Rich ended up going to join Ben at RIAFox (where they are working on a cool new project I’m very excited about).

Twitter Validates Darcy

So what does all of this have to do with Twitter? There are two key features in Twitter that show how the tagging system work. The example works much better if you’re using TweetDeck because of the way that it lets you manage @replies and #hashtags and your network.

To exemplify I’m going to write a fake post about the upcoming IgniteBoise event.

Subject Spring 09 IgniteBoise

@LGM1 @RizenCreative @WyattWerner @JGlerum @nipper I’ve been thinking about the venue for #IgniteBoise. I really like the #EgyptianTheatre because it’s downtown and has a very cool vibe. Wyatt have you been able to talk with @KrissaW about who #IdaVation talked to at the Egyptian yet?

I’ve also been thinking about sponsors for the event. @hwy12 and I haven’t been able to talk in great deal about #Highway12ventures being a sponsor but I know they are interested and @hwy12 will be a presenter. We still need to follow up with #HawleyTroxell #KPMG and #StoleRives. Any others?

I’ll be at the #NWEnergy summit the first part of this week so I may not be very responsive, not sure if they have wifi or not.

Now in this post I obviously had to go through and find all the hyperlinks (although Zemanta did a pretty good job of suggesting several of them). In Twitter by simply adding an @ or a # this creates the link in TweetDeck. TweetDeck also opens the @’s within the app and let’s you see who this person is and if you want to follow them and which group you’d like to add them to. And to be fair the # opens to the Twitter Search not the home page.

This example isn’t perfect and some of the differences I see for an internal communication tool would be the @username’s would be the same as a company email, each person would have their own and the hyperlink would open to a company directory page. The #hashtag would open to a wiki like page that has a search stream for that # and a any known static content. (You’re already seeing some wiki providers creating cool wiki mashup and profile pages like SocialText.)

I think that internal communication is heading in this direction. It may take a decade or so for us to get there. I think that the various wiki providers are pretty close but honestly Microsoft is probably the closest to this. With XML built into their entire platform now its not a stretch for them to connect Outlook and SharePoint in a similar fashion to this.

We even imagined auto searching and tagging all internal documents (MS Office) and IM (MS Communicator) If you really wanted to get Big Brother, turn all your phone’s to VOIP and run a voice to text program.

People could be alerted to project updates in real time based on project notes, emails, IM, etc. Some people think Enterprise RSS readers are dead, some don’t. I think that as stand alone applications this may hold some truth but Enterprise RSS, as a capability is just getting started IMO.

So if anyone out there wants to take this idea and run with it, feel free. If nothing else I hope you can learn from my mistakes.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 4% [?]

Tagged with:
 

An Open Letter to Web Startups: Please Take My Money

Money

It was just announced that comment tracking service Co.mments will be shutting their doors. We are going to be seeing a lot of startups running out of cash in 2009. A space like comment tracking can only handle so many entrants, especially when none of them have a viable business model yet.

Over the last few months I’ve been thinking a lot about what would happen if some of my most beloved services bit the dust.

What if Twitter, Zemanta, Brightkite, Diigo, or Tweetdeck folded up? I’d be crushed. I have made huge investments of time and content into these sites. Having to move over to another service would be a huge loss.

Some of these services would have a bigger effect on my life than others. I’ve also started evaluating new services with a new criteria: Are they going to be around next year?

I love Flickr and gladly pay my $20 dollars a year to support them. When I hooked up Jing and my camera phone up to my account I quickly maxed out the free version. I could have gone through and deleted all the photo’s I don’t use, or switched to another free service but I chose to pay my $20.

As I looked over the above listed service I wondered what it would take to get me to pay a premium service?

If Tweetdeck roles out the ability to manage multiple accounts, and synch multiple machines I’d gladly pay for that. If they came out with an iPhone app, I’d buy that as well.

Image representing Brightkite as depicted in C...
Image via CrunchBase

If Brightkite let me synch photo’s to Flickr and gave me a private channel to talk with friends, like BrightKite group chat I’d pay.

Image representing Diigo as depicted in CrunchBase
Image via CrunchBase

Diigo, I don’t know what else they could add, they already do so much. It probably wouldn’t take much but I’d pay. Do they have an iPhone app? I’d pay for an iPhone app for sure.

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

Our beloved Twitter. Just ask and I’d pay right now. If they made it voluntary to pay, I’d do it in a heartbeat. Realistically though I think Twitter’s revenue (oh yes I have my own theories about their revenue model) will come from acquiring revenue generating add on services.

**Update**

Apparently to test my point TechSmith just sent me an email announcing the release of Jing Pro. Jing is a great screen capture tool I use frequently and love. Jing Pro has all the picture and video capabilities of Jing and allows you to upload your videos directly to YouTube (you could already send your pics to Flickr). I immediately plunked down my 14.95, bringing my paid for Web tools count to 2.

What about you? Do you find yourself thinking twice about which services you’ll invest your time in?

Which services that you use would you pay for?

Image by jenn_jenn via Flickr

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 5% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Ask, and TweetDeck Giveth

Image representing TweetDeck as depicted in Cr...

Image by via CrunchBase

I love TweetDeck. There are very few apps that I would declare a love affair with. If it wasn’t for TweetDeck there is no way I could be as effective, efficient and engaged as I am on Twitter with 1400+ followers. Dividing multiple followers into multiple columns is a true life saver.

It also has brilliant integration with TwitScoop (Twitter search) and 12seconds, if you’re into video.

I just have two problems with it.

1 – I run multiple laptops and have Tweetdeck installed on all of them. I also have multiple groups set up. Trying to go back and recreate each of those groups is a huge pain. Being able to synch multiple Tweetdecks would be a huge advantage.

So I asked

tweetdeck1

2 – I run multiple Twitter accounts. This forces me to keep using Twhirl to manage my TechBoise account. I really wish that TweetDeck let me manage multiple accounts from one app. So I asked again

tweetdeck2

Today I got a response from TweetDeck

tweetdeck reply

A – Great response, they just sealed a user for life.

B – Their Twitter stream is filled with responses just like this. They have to have someone full time just listening and responding to requests.

So if you’re a Twitter user, I highly recommend TweetDeck and if you have any requests, just ask @TweetDeck

What features do you want to see in TweetDeck?

Technorati Tags: ,
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 8% [?]

Tagged with:
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 6369 access attempts in the last 7 days.